UC System De-Recognizes InterVarsity

CT

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

What I Learned about Atheists from “God is Not Dead”

Godless in Dixie

I haven’t seen the movie. Some of my Christian friends have recommended it to me. I’ve been resistant because I fear it either is or comes off to my atheist friends exactly what this article says. Creating a wooden straw person and the caricatures run both ways.

I’ll take the main points of his post and see if they also play the other way:

Christians are such a pitiful, deluded bunch

Interesting that Atheists are usually described as miserable and Christians as foolish, but happy in their delusions.

  1.  Christian pastors (we erroneously assume Christians aren’t university professors) are predatory, they are out to convert everyone into ideological clones of themselves. This is probably more true of Christian pastors than atheist university professors.
  2. Christians are selfish, self-absorbed, greedy jerks
  3. Christians are cocky, self-sure, and totally enamored with their own superiority.
  4. Christians will openly threaten you,
  5. Christians are incapable of love: They just want to force you to live by their archaic rules.
  6. Christians lack ethical boundaries but are instead abject hypocrites who can’t often even live by their own rules. This is true of course, but true of humans, not just Christians.
  7. Christians believe in God because something good happened to them or they are just mindless dupes who still believe a loving father or mother.
  8. Can’t say Christians are angry at God, maybe they’re angry at other gods or someone’s lack of belief. I know many Christians who are angry at God, and also some former Christians. If you’re angry at God and stick with belief you’ve got a complicated relationship, which is normal. If you’re angry at people who believe in God, well, anger is usually our own issue anyway.
  9. Christians are miserable because they live for stupid, archaic rules that are based on myths and superstitions rather than reason and science.
  10. Christians have no basis for belief they just act out of mindless superstition and unquestioned or unchallenged ideas passed on to them by their equally gullible parents.
Posted in Culture commentary | 1 Comment

RIP Average Attendance

Changing Participation Metrics in Churches Today

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Macbeth on the meaning of life

The days creep slowly along until the end of time. And every day that’s already happened has taken fools that much closer to their deaths. Out, out, brief candle. Life is nothing more than an illusion. It’s like a poor actor who struts and worries for his hour on the stage and then is never heard from again. Life is a story told by an idiot, full of noise and emotional disturbance but devoid of meaning.

Posted in Quotations | Leave a comment

“White Supremacy Ate My French Homework” Ctd « The Dish

http://dish.andrewsullivan.com/2014/09/05/white-supremacy-ate-my-french-homework-ctd/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+andrewsullivan%2FrApM+%28The+Dish%29

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Moby Dick and Sacramentalism

“Hark ye yet again— the little lower layer. All visible objects, man, are but as pasteboard masks. But in each event— in the living act, the undoubted deed— there, some unknown but still reasoning thing puts forth the mouldings of its features from behind the unreasoning mask. If man will strike, strike through the mask! How can the prisoner reach outside except by thrusting through the wall? To me, the white whale is that wall, shoved near to me. Sometimes I think there’s naught beyond. But ’tis enough. He tasks me; he heaps me; I see in him outrageous strength, with an inscrutable malice sinewing it. That inscrutable thing is chiefly what I hate; and be the white whale agent, or be the white whale principal, I will wreak that hate upon him.

Melville, Herman (2011-03-24). Moby Dick: or, the White Whale (Kindle Locations 2344-2349). . Kindle Edition.

Posted in Quotations | 1 Comment

Jacob Milgrom

Posted in Link Compilations | Leave a comment

How Yhwh Talks to the Elephant in Leviticus

Be Holy

The thesis statement of the book of Leviticus is found in chapter 19:

“Be holy, because I the LORD your God am holy.”

If you were to drop this command onto a common Californian living in 2014  questions would immediately arise.

  • Why should I be holy? (Motivation)
  • What do you mean by holy? (Interpretive in a pluralistic context)
  • Who are you talking to? Me as an individual or a group? (Identity)

If I were then to give them the book of Leviticus, the conversation would probably stop or get stranger still. If they would open the book they’d see that the book starts out in chapter 1-7 to the laity and the priests on what sacrifices to offer and how to offer them. This for most would be a non-starter.

Sacrifices, blood or vegetable are not a part of our culture and many of us have strong moral questions about the whole idea.

Last week we saw that at first glance Leviticus looks to many of us as embarrassing, strange or offensive. I wanted to make the point, however, that it may not be as far away from us as we would first imagine. Beginning the exploration with the subject of sacrifices doesn’t seem to help.

How Do You Understand Holiness? 

At first glance, especially among friends who are a little reactive to Christianity and its history in the world, the word itself “Holy” will bring in images of self-righteousness and a “holier than thou” attitude.

When combined with the book of Leviticus whose reputation in our culture is often one of senseless and arbitrary rules that discriminate or harm people, you may have or get from a friend a very strong reaction.

That’s understandable. Holiness is often about a sort of separation. When the separation is combined with a self-righteous, superior attitude we naturally and instinctively interpret it as rejection and our reaction is to reject back.

Chic Holiness in our Conflictive Cultural Conversation Continue reading →

Posted in On the way to Sunday's sermon | Tagged , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

How Altar and Table are One in Leviticus

Thus, when I started to research Leviticus, I found myself on the ground floor. Early on I discovered that rituals are meaningless in themselves. Only when seen as a set of symbols do their inherent values come to light. I shall cite an example from the same dietary laws. Quadrupeds that qualify for the table must chew the cud and show split hoofs (11:3*). These criteria sound absurd. But consider: they effectively eliminate the entire animal kingdom from human consumption, except for three domestic herbivores: cattle, sheep, and goats. Moreover, these are the same three animals permitted on the sacrificial altar (17:3*). The implications are clear. All life is sacred and inviolable. Only these three stipulated quadrupeds are eligible for the human table because they are eligible for God’s altar/table. The dining table symbolically becomes an altar, and all the diners are symbolically priests. (In Judaism, the equivalence of table and altar is carried further: just as the priest must wash [Exod 30:17–21*] and salt the meat before offering the sacrifice [Lev 2:13*], so must the diners ritually wash their hands and salt the table’s bread, which represents the sacrifice.) Above all, the table is transformed into a sacred altar and the meal must be treated as sacred—a time for thanking God for the repast (cf. Lev 7:11–13*), requesting a blessing for the future (Num 6:22–26*), and engaging in conversation befitting the sanctified meal.

Milgrom, J. (2004). A Continental Commentary: Leviticus: a book of ritual and ethics (p. xii). Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.

Posted in Quotations | Leave a comment

Website Embraces Aztec Spirituality

Even considering human sacrifice

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment