In the June 19 edition there’s a long story of a man and his journey.
There is much fluidity and much striving for definition. What is a definition in our cultural context? Are these sexual-identity platonists? Fascinating.
In the June 19 edition there’s a long story of a man and his journey.
There is much fluidity and much striving for definition. What is a definition in our cultural context? Are these sexual-identity platonists? Fascinating.
ht: Voices via Bill Vis
CT Leadership Journal
We anxiously avoid casting moral judgment. Because with absolute truths elusive, what claims do we have to insist that our moral positions are better than those of someone from a different nation or culture?
Consider the challenge we might face when confronted with videos from the popular youth-oriented news outlet Vice. Here, viewers can watch videos of communities, from across the globe, participating in a host of culturally specific activities, ranging from excessive forms of eating to ritual violence to bestiality. While the greater Western culture may denounce these acts, a substantial millennial constituency would hesitate to condemn them, in the interest of embracing “difference.”
Barbara Ehrenreich author of Nickel and Dimed has a new book coming out. Clearly the book promotion, a bunch of interviews
No. What happens is, here you have this amazing, charismatic, madly generous Jesus, who says that when someone asks for your coat, give him not just your coat but your cloak also. Someone sues you in the court of law, give him everything. Then he turns into God, or the Son of God, and becomes the risen Christ. Now everything changes. Because now there is a personal selfish goal to be achieved in following this faith. To get into heaven. To get into heaven.
What strikes me about the question and the theoried answers is how the premise behind the answers are leading. “Why” is assumed to be answered by a Darwinian motivation, survival. The stripes must (we assume) contribute to their competitive advantage. The “why” can’t include, we imagine an aesthetic motivation, which is probably a principle motivation by us for our interest in them. We do the same with beautiful birds or insects talking about mating advantages, etc.
This isn’t to say that there isn’t validity in all of that, but consider the opposite. Why are there so many counter-productive elements in biology? Why haven’t we evolved beings to not die? Why don’t we reproduce more? Why aren’t we stronger, faster, etc? Surely all of these things would be beneficial to our survival? These questions we don’t ask. Why not?