“Where are you from?” Video

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

On why Hope and Vapid Optimism Are Not the Same Thing

From the Sarcastic Lutheran and RHE Sunday Superlatives

The Easter hope we have, brothers and sisters, the hope that never disappoints has nothing to do with optimism or the avoidance of suffering,  is a hope that can only come from a God who has experienced birth, and love and friendship and lepers and prostitutes and betrayal and suffering and death and burial and a decent into hell itself. Only a God who has born suffering himself can bring us any real hope of resurrection. And if ever given the choice of optimism or resurrection I’d go with resurrection any day of the week.  This is the God of whom Paul speaks.  And the Christian faith is one that does not pretend things aren’t bad. This is a faith that does not offer platitudes to those who lost children this week to suicide or a tornado. This is not a faith that produces optimism it is a faith that produces a defiant hope that God is still writing the story and that despite darkness a light shines and that God can redeem our crap and the beauty matters and that despite every disappointing thing we have ever done or that we have ever endured, that there is no hell from which resurrection is impossible. The Christian faith is one that kicks at the darkness until it bleeds daylight.*

*From Bruce Cockburn’s Lovers in a Dangerous Time

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Dr. Richard Mouw and Dr. Robert Millet at the May 2012 Faith Angle Forum | Ethics & Public Policy Center

http://www.eppc.org/publication/mouw-and-millet/

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

CT Mobile | The Shepherd

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2013/may/shepherd-michael-cromartie-faith-angle-forum.html?paging=off

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Would you rather have a redemptive story of significance or immunity from loss?

Immunity from Loss or Significance? 

If God were to come to you and offer you either immunity from loss or a significant life for circles broader than your relational or familial networks, which would you choose?

Bethel Blessings

God meets Jacob twice at Bethel and the encounters are worth comparing.

While Abraham’s anxiety focused on children, Jacob’s anxieties mostly focused upon security. Abraham’s life would be marked by the struggle to have a legitimate heir by his wife Sarah. Jacob’s story would be a struggle for security within the context of family threats. He was first threatened by Esau, then Laban, then Esau again and finally the fear of retribution for the murder and looting perpetrated by his sons against Shechem. Jacob’s constant worry about security would be matched by Yhwh’s faithfulness to deliver him time and time again. 

The blessing at the first Bethel meeting had the following elements:

  • God’s self-declaration: “I am Yhwh the God of Abraham…”
  • Land: “I will give you and your descendants the land you’re sleeping on.”
  • Descendants: “they will be like the dust of the earth, they will spread out…”
  • Future Blessing: “all the families of the earth will be blessed through you…”
  • Personal Blessing: “I am with you and will go with you”
  • Safe Return: “I will bring you back to this land and will no leave you…”

The blessing at the second meeting in Bethel had these elements:

  • Renaming: “Israel shall be your name”
  • God’s Self-declaration: “I am El Shaddai”
  • Re-assert the creation mandate: “Be fruitful and multiply” (Gen 1 to the man and the woman, Genesis 9 to Noah and now here to Jacob. New beginning?)
  • Descendants: “nations will come from you, kings from your loins…”
  • Land: “The land of Abraham and Isaac… to your descendants.”
  • Continue reading →
Posted in On the way to Sunday's sermon | Tagged | 2 Comments

Tim Keller Interview on the Post-Christian Right

http://www.eppc.org/publication/dr-timothy-keller-at-the-march-2013-faith-angle-forum/

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Is the Scientific, Therapeutic Appropriation of Spirituality Fundamentally A Placebo?

Most (not all) agree:

  • “Spirituality” as commonly understood has measurable psychological, therapeutic benefits. Therapists  attempt to employ “spiritual” language to help give their patience a sense of well-being.
  • Science itself cannot resolve fundamental differences between religions. (Monotheism/polytheism vs. pantheism, Moses or Jesus or Buddha or Muhammad or “all of the above”, etc.)

In an attempt to employ religious or spiritual perspectives to afford practical comfort from a scientific perspective (non-sectarian) most practitioners attempt to get as non-specific as possible.

  • This is not new of course. AA made this move years ago.
  • Pastors regularly  postulate that the Athenian altar to the “unknown god” that Paul refers to was a similar move.
  • “God” is of course a problematic word for many coming out of Christendom so people today commonly take up “higher power” or “divine” or “transcendent” or “universe“

Attributes and Relationship

I think it is important to point out that the move to get as non-specific as possible about our commitment to divine attributes is itself making a statement about the relative importance of divine attributes in a potential relationship. We of course know this about relationships. People are highly committed not only to their personal attributes but also to the perception of the other to their attributes. “Do you think these jeans make my butt look big?”

This is not a small point in the therapeutic appropriation of the spiritual or religious aspect in therapy, but it’s not my main concern right now.

Avoiding Sectarian Ugliness Continue reading →

Posted in philosophical reflection | Leave a comment

Can California Public Schools do Yoga in Gym Class?

from First things

So here’s a question: if official yoga programs are allowed on the theory that they have been scrubbed of religious associations, will pious Hindus object? Will people start demanding to keep the yoga  in yoga?

oops, the Hindus are objecting. 

“The Great Yoga Debate”

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Ed Cyzewski on the consequences of ignoring the hard parts of the Bible

Link

I’m less and less convinced that the Bible exists to give us straight answers. If that was the purpose of the Bible, then it does a bad job of it.

Rather, the Bible comforts, questions, and disrupts us. We can see that our troubles today are nothing new and that people have been seeking out God for thousands of years, asking questions, making requests, and finding hope in the presence of God.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

John Suk on What it Takes to Write a Sermon

from his blog Not Sure

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment