Still think we’re not multiple selves in time?

Posted in book writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Locating the Self, Resolving the Host

Lots of people wonder WHAT the soul is. Lots of people wonder WHERE the soul is when someone has died. Very few people wonder WHERE the soul is when someone is still alive.

In my last post I suggested that we should think about “the self” as a practical approximation for “the soul”. Continue reading →

Posted in book writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Paul in Athens

Conflict in Naming the Good

The Apostle Paul is many times a persona non grata in the cities of his first and second missionary journey. Luke’s telling of his story often highlights the trouble he perpetually found himself in. He is at times in trouble with Gentiles and at times in trouble with his own ethnic group.

Luke in the book of Acts many times portrays Paul and Peter as heirs of the kinds of trouble Jesus had during his own public ministry.

Life is in fact full of competing religions, ideologies, moral systems and ways of life and any significant contribution into the public dialogue concerning “the good life” will evoke opposition and conflict. Continue reading →

Posted in On the way to Sunday's sermon | Tagged | Leave a comment

Self as a Plausibility Structure for Hard Spirituality

Believing in Hard Spirituality

As I mentioned in my previous post doubts in hard spirituality seems to be on the rise even if it will be an uphill climb for materialistic evolutionary psychology. While over the long haul I think it stands to reason that dismissing hard spirituality is an up hill climb, in the short term maintaining belief in a hard spirituality is a struggle for many.

My relationship with what I’m reading in evolutionary psychology is just as complex as my relationship with what I read of evolutionary biology. I respect these scientists and have no ground to doubt much of what they assert. The final leap to materialism (or perhaps the initial presupposition of materialism) I don’t share. Continue reading →

Posted in book writing | Tagged | 2 Comments

A book note

A couple of people have commented to me about my blog posts under “the self book” tag with some helpful comments. I’ll clarify something.

I use the blog to work out language and ideas, organize and record quotations, brainstorm. What you read here isn’t necessarily “chapters from the book”. I need to do a lot of thinking about a lot of things.

Actually getting the wording right, the audience right, the presentation right is another part of the process.

It isn’t dissimilar to what I do with my blog post I make in sermon preparation. Stuff feeds into it, but my blog posts are not my sermon. pvk

Posted in book writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Materialism and Hard and Soft Spiritualities

Christian Smith has done some interesting sociological research on religious beliefs of young adults. His books Souls in Transition and Soul Searching paint a picture of the religious assumptions of youth in American across the religious landscape. It was in Soul Searching that I first came across his term Moralistic, Therapeutic Deism or MTD.  It’s 5 governing beliefs are these:

1. A god exists who created and orders the world and watches over life on earth.
2. God wants people to be good, nice and fair to each other, as taught in the Bible and by most world religions.
3. The central goal of life is to be happy and to feel good about oneself.
4. God is not involved in my life except when I need God to resolve a problem.
5. Good people go to heaven when they die. (– Kindle location 267-276).

If find broad consensus among most of the people I know around these, even atheists if you can redact God from this picture. Continue reading →

Posted in book writing | Tagged | 2 Comments

The Word “Spiritual” as a vague marketplace of diverse feelings and ideals

Towards a working definition of “Spiritual” or “Spirituality”

I’m going to do a little series on this word in the pursuit of an intelligible metaphor for the spiritual within our skeptical, secular context. This is part one.

“Spiritual” is one of the most frustrating words for me. It is close to becoming a meaningless word.

When I think about how the word is used I think about my friend Forrest who is a magician. “Spiritual” means, as best I can discern its usage today, the thing under the fancy handkerchief that Forrest is about to do something to or with. It’s covered, unseen, the focus of attention. It’s just out of sight, but everyone is interested, involved, fascinated, making assertions about what is not too clear.  Continue reading →

Posted in book writing | Tagged | Leave a comment

Doubt and Unbelief in Recent Surveys

Found an interesting thing in the American Values survey on unbelief.

One of the interesting findings in the religious beliefs over time was the jump in the “no” answers to “Do you believe in God?” question.

  • 1944: 96% yes, 1% no
  • 1967:  98% yes, 1% no
  • 2012:  89% yes, 11% no

A closer look at the data susses out the skew. In age: 18-29 year olds only 81% say “yes”, 19% say “no”. All other age groups are over 90% “yes”. 18-29 year olds 19% say “no”.

Southerners are more likely to believe than the other areas of the country. Republicans are more likely to believe than Democrats. Independents are the least likely to believe in God.

Tracking with this a Huffington post piece on doubt among young people called “Doubt by the numbers”.  Their following up on a CNN piece reporting on a Pew study.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | 1 Comment

Study on the correlation between societal religious beliefs and crime rates

I remember reading a study a couple of years ago that found correlation between productivity and a belief in hell. This one finds a correlation between a belief in hell and crime rates. Huffington Post. 

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Tagged | Leave a comment

Heaven and Hell Questions in the light of the Self and the Face of the one on the Throne

A post on CRC Voices about the final judgment, about whether a person goes to hell when they die, or is it Hades and then hell, etc. A discussion started and I shared these thoughts.

Part of the puzzle is frame or story of self. There are a lot of questions involved especially of approach and process.

Hoekema, who’s book I consider to be the best thing I’ve read on these matters WITH his kind of approach approaches the question almost in isolation from the rest of relational theology. We have Bible passages that talk about X, and so then we learn about it via those passages. We call it systematic, but it is in some ways as siloed as other approaches.

1. Relationships trump comfy digs: Another avenue in is to think about it relationally. One of the common themes of the Bible is friendship with God and loyalty to Christ. This always sounds like kinship or clanishness but it does make sense on a relational level. If you can’t stand a person why would you want to live with them? Continue reading →

Posted in book writing, Saved CRCVoices Posts | Tagged , | Leave a comment