“Salvation” In The Box

People are looking for help because people are a mess, all of us. Whether we realize it or now we are all self-destructive, ardent self-salvationists. We instinctively try to rescue ourselves from what we see as threatening us and we do it in different ways.

What I’m about to write is very much a work in progress, working through some ideas out loud. It’s a way of self-processing, thinking through a bunch of things. That’s part of what a blog’s for. Anyway, end of disclaimer.

I watch people working to rescue themselves and I see patterns. Part of what we also struggle with in the church is religious pluralism and the “competitors” for the kind of rescue people are seeking.

Part of being helping I think is being honest. People get help with themselves through all kinds of things. Help is, at a certain level, help. We’ll have to get into the deeper weeds of “help” later as we go because part of what we’ll see is that all “help” is not the same. Some “help” brings temporary relief but brings longer term complications. We know this medically, we see it socially, it’s important to keep that in mind as we get into the “help” discussion especially as it relates to religion and worldview.

Sources of our Distress

Experientially fear and pain appear as great enemies of us in the age of decay. People are afflicted and are in pain. Sane people experience fear. In the age of decay we lose everything and nothing is secure. Time ravages our bodies, our relationships, threatens our dreams, our hopes, and our idols. Handling pain, not just physical pain of course, is a major concern. Likewise managing and trying to defeat fear too is central to much human civilization. Fear and pain drive us to many things, that seeking itself then brings us to different places, and that is a lot of what I’ll be postulating a bit here.

We naturally seek to address fear and pain, but not all means are the same.

Lower order, dangerous powers

I’m no expert on brain structures, and what I hear may be a bunch of bunk, but I hear about parts of the brain in what is presented as an evolutionary framework between lower order, instinctive, more automatic functions and higher order, more highly developed areas of the brain. The lower order functions are vital for our survival as “animals”, are tremendously powerful in their capacity to “take over” immediate behavior and powerfully adjust our perception of reality. The fight/flight response comes to mind here with respect to pain and fear. When we are in pain we draw back, when we are afraid we respond.

The fight/flight mechanism often results in anger and violence. We instinctively and immediately respond to a threat and the response is automatic and powerful. Difficulties come, however, when these these responses go beyond the immediate threat of a speeding car or an attacking dog. When these responses become part of our way of addressing ordinary life, life breaks down, relationships are impossible to maintain, and there is no peace in the mind.

I remember listen to an ” NYC Radiolabs” and they were talking about the brain and drugs. Drugs trigger things in the brain. Think about anger, sex, chemicals (alcohol, drugs), etc. These are lower order powers that trigger deep structures in our brains. They can powerful bring an experience of control, comfort, escape and address pain and fear. In many cases the things themselves are not bad, but they can be abused and here is where we get into the language of abuse and addiction. We self-medicate through these lower order powers and when we do so in an abusive or addictive way we destroy ourselves. This doesn’t seem hard to understand.

I also categorize distraction at this level. Again, there are many wonders in this world but we as a society through technology have really perfected the practice. Movies, books, entertainment, games, culture making, work, etc. None of this is bad in and of itself, but when it becomes a regular way of medicating ourselves, finding comfort, addressing fear and pain, problems can arise. If we are busy enough we can keep the pain and fear at bay and move along. Long term, of course, and in some cases this is dangerous. We also call this denial.

Many aspects of our civilization are acquainted with this approach and rightly warn against it. The medical community knows about it and approaches it with its tools. Religions likewise have long attempted to address it through morals, taboos, teachings, etc. We can appreciate the danger of the lower order approaches to addressing fear and pain.

A word about other religions. I know that Christian exclusivists (of which I count myself as one) have long had difficulty in figuring out how to approach non-Christian religions. I think it is important to recognize that religion making is an aspect of culture making and much religion is generated by general revelation and therefore out not necessarily to be dismissed out of hand. A fair critique of other religions I think recognizes that people have developed practices in order to address pain and fear in the age of decay and a good bit of what they may be practicing and proposing should be considered within that realm. Biblical wisdom literature freely and overtly takes from “wisdom” of other pagan peoples. I don’t think we need to be embarrassed by this. I think it’s a part of human civilization, the capacity for which was built into us by the creator. I will get into some of these issues a bit later in this little project because there is more to say.

Middle level powers

Some people never get beyond the lower level powers. Some of these people are addicts. All of these people are miserable. The lower level powers can in the short terms deal with a lot, but many of the powers are too strong and we quickly abuse them to our own longer term misery. At some point many people being to realize this and begin to look in different places for longer term, more life giving, more communally friendly powers to address their fear and pain.

Some lower powers get domesticated and are leveraged and employed in ways that are less destructive. Please don’t understand “lower” in my mind to work on a gnostic or material/spiritual spectrum. I mean “lower” in terms of the language of brain evolution as it is employed today. Anger, sex, chemicals, all of our means of distraction are not evil or “part of the body”, they are aspects of who we and are in my religious framework gifts from God. “lower” means closer to the “brain stem” (again, I probably don’t know what I’m talking about here) and therefore instinctively able to take us over automatically. Middle level powers appropriate some of these things in ways that don’t wreak so much havoc in our lives.

Items on my middle level powers are these (probably not a complete list)
Music
talking, community, psychotherapy
meditation, breathing,
exercise
learning and insight

In this middle way we begin to approach our fear and pain and more areas of the mind are informing each other. The sources of fear and pain may or may not be addressed, but the lower order powers are not adding to the fear and pain by simply reacting to them.

You will notice that the elements of this list are very much common to many religions. Through these middle level powers people can make real progress in dealing with their stuff.

One of the real water shed places for dealing with fear and pain is self-awareness and these middle level powers help in this way. In the lower level powers people are for the most part reactive and that mindless reactivity often gets them into deeper trouble. They cannot “read the room” or figure out what other things are going on. The mid level powers here open up our capacity to see ourselves and our interchange with our environment and hopefully, potentially to stop doing stupid things.

Employing these mid level powers can also help make us “better people”. People who are living out of their lower level powers are often near impossible to be with. They are functional solipsists. All that matters is their fear and pain and the immediate escape from it. Community suffers. People who get to the level of managing fear and pain with middle level powers can sustain community, in fact community is often required for these approaches to work.

When we look at these through the religious aspect I think its appropriate for Christians to recognize the “good” that other religions do for people. I remember meeting a young Jehovah Witness who came to my door to proselytize and I saw his tattoos. I said to him, “you didn’t get these as a Jehovah Witness did you.” and he said he didn’t. He shared with me that his life was a mess, in drugs and gangs and being a Jehovah’s Witness helped him get his life together.

Christian exclusivists (like myself) sometimes have trouble with this. Christians regularly like to use their testimony stories of people finding peace and order through the church as a validation of the truth of their religion. Stories of other people finding peace and order (through these middle level powers) however are not exclusive to the Christian faith by any means. You will find people who find sanity through twelve step programs, through new age religions, through Islam, through sects like the Jehovah’s Witnesses and LDS church, and also through finding a spouse, through reading a book, etc. Middle level powers are not exclusively Christian, they are human and have likely always been a part of what I see in my tradition as common grace or in Jonathan Edward’s terminology as “common virtue”.

A Word about Idolatry

Tim Keller’s teaching on idolatry has been a very helpful framework for me in terms of practical ministry. Idols are good things that we make into ultimate things. Idolatry can function at all levels of human living. In the lower order powers idolatry is pretty easy to see and is very destructive. We usually call that addiction. Idolatry also functions among the mid-level powers. These idols, however, are more sophisticated. We can live with them longer. They are, finally, however, idols. They can’t really bring shalom, restoration, renewal. They can’t finally actually deal with pain and fear. Our hearts must be located in something beyond the age of decay. When we locate our hearts with in the age of decay (Romans 1) we bind ourselves to it and our destruction follows the destruction of all of those things subject to decay.

A Word about Fear and Pain

I have to a degree called “fear and pain” the enemies in this piece because this is what we tend to be fleeing from. I don’t think fear and pain are really the enemies but actually gifts that help to make us aware of the deeper enemies and dangers. If we are aware of our danger we ought to be afraid. Pain is a way by which we are aware that we are experiencing loss.

Higher order powers

At this level we begin to get into the areas of religion, philosophy and worldview. What is finally true, what is finally ultimate, what matters.

It is at this point that fear and pain are no longer the threats, but seen as ways we interact with deeper threats that aren’t immediately obvious to us by simple observation. Lower level powers (and when we are under their power) are unaware of mid-level and higher level powers. Mid-level powers know what is below them but struggle with what is above them. Higher order powers know what is beneath them, manages them, engages them, but all in the service of their own level. In some ways this is the level of life where things get weird.

I am often amazed at the programability of humanity. People have had may ways of viewing reality and the diversity of these ways is tremendous. Look at the history of the world and the diversity of worldviews and how they have been employed no only on an individual level but on a communal levels. Mayans practiced human sacrifice at an incredible level. Egyptians built the pyramids. The emperor of china built the terra-cotta army. It’s at this level that we begin to grapple with our idols and to grapple with why we are here and what we are doing. This level ought rightly to inform our practices on the other levels and begin to integrate life as a whole. Its at this level that our worldviews have practical implications that trickle down.

Now we begin to ask questions about meaning, purpose, truth, destiny, where pain and fear are servants, not masters. Now we begin to wonder “Is there something beyond the level where our sciences help us?” “Is the foundation of the universe personal or impersonal?” “Does the eternal exist?”

All “salvations” in the lower and mid-level powers are within the box of science and human experience. It is at the higher level powers that we begin to explore the box itself.

I think it is at this level that all inclusivisms vanish and we are all exclusivists. It is at this point where the resurrection, the end of the age of decay, the renewal of all things can begin to be seen for the claim that it is, ultimate.

Posted in philosophical reflection | Leave a comment

Two new posts on other blogs

Been swamped lately so I haven’t had much time for personal blogging. Here are some things I’ve written for other places.

My latest Think Christian piece thinking through a gospel response to Dan Savage.

A guest blogger piece for the CRC Network on Individualism and Communal Confessionalism.  

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

Quote from “On Being” by Peter Atkins

Gleaned this from the Books and Culture podcast.  This quote nicely shows the core argument of the book. It’s hard to see how much it is an argument as it is a naked assertion.

“In broad terms the law asserts (2nd law of thermodynamics) that things get worse…

That’s all there is to natural change, spreading disorder. The astonishing thing is that this spreading can result in the emergence of exquisite form. If the spreading is captured in an engine then bricks may be hoisted to build a cathedral. If the spreading occurs in a seed then molecules may be hoisted to build and orchid. If the spreading occurs in your body then random electrical and molecular currents in your brain may be organized into an opinion. The spreading of matter and energy is the root of all change…

Like it or not purposeless decay into disorder is the spring of all change even when that change is exquisite or results in seemingly purposeful action. At its heart then all actions, be they physical or cerebral are purposeless. The process of making decisions may appear to us to be purposeful because the metaphorical gears in our brains that are driven by the unwinding spring are meshed together in such a complex way, are linked into the chemical repositories of our memories, experiences and aspirations and are responsive to stimuli from our environment that the unwinding appears to have purpose. Indeed I do not deny the existence of personal purpose for our brains are such that in ways that are only slowly being unraveled by neuro-scientists they can identify pathways to pleasure, to fulfillment of various kinds, even to martyrdom, if that is their bag. But we should be aware that we, just like everything, are driven by purposeless decay, that is why we have to eat.

Now we come up against the crux. Even though at heart all change is driven by purposeless decay, our mental activity insures that our lives are full of personal purpose. The sense of purposefulness is so great that there is a natural tendency to extend the notion to cosmic entities. As a result people have reflected at length on the purpose of the universe taking the view that if anything is made and is for human activities then there is purposeful action behind it. This extrapolation from the personal to the cosmic is false.”

It’s not hard for me to see two things:
1. That the assertion of purposelessness isn’t anything more than a naked assertion. If one finds a rock in the garden it is impossible to know if that rock was placed their intentionally or unitentionally.
2. The foundational nihilism of the position. On what basis is human activity then purposeful and not simply apparent purposelessness. This seems at heart to boil down to basic determinism. Nothing matters.

Posted in Quotations | 1 Comment

Posting in other places

My latest on ThinkChristian.net is “Can Noah’s Ark Still Save”

I’m also writing for the CRC Network on the Classical blog.

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

8 Rules for Effective Feedback

Got these from this article in Psychology Today

  • Always lead with questions: How do you think you’re doing? It gives the recipient joint ownership of the problem and helps him feel included, not excluded.
  • Never give criticism unless it’s been invited; unsolicited negative feedback only provokes annoyance and will be discounted.
  • Make sure you are seen as having the authority to give corrective feedback. Criticism from those perceived as peers or unqualified to give it incites resistance and rebellion.
  • Distinguish whether a demand for change reflects your needs or is a valid critique of how someone is doing something. Know when “You’re too demanding” really means “I wish I felt more accepted.”
  • Never give feedback when you’re angry; anger alienates the listener. Expressing disappointment is more productive.
  • Know who you’re talking to. Narcissists take any criticism as a personal attack; the insecure lose all self-esteem.
  • Know yourself, too. If you’re relatively insensitive to criticism, curb the tendency to be heavy-handed when delivering it, says Cacioppo, who counts himself among the less sensitive.
  • Expect defensiveness as a first response to criticism; a change in performance may come later.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Divine Regard and the Search for the Historical Adam

Christianity Today had a cover story on The Search for Historical Adam and the swirling controversy this has created. I thought it was a good and helpful article. I’m dubious as to biology’s capacity to “discover” who or what the historical Adam was through genetic research. I am no scientist and I don’t have any basis upon which to doubt or challenge the claims made by these findings. The reason for my thinking at this time is simply this, the Adam we meet in the Bible is created by divine regard.

The first couple, the man and the woman, Adam and Eve are who they are because God regards them as the parents of humanity. The actions for which they were judged by God as being culpable were directly related both to their moral capacity as perceived by God. When a lion eats a baby zebra we don’t perceive it as a moral act. When animals act in a way that is counter productive to the well being of the planet, let’s say through over population or over grazing we don’t assert that “they should have known better”, the standard we hold ourselves to. There is a significant difference in terms of regard between how approach human beings and how we approach the rest of the animal kingdom. That line is bright and thick and not really getting any thinner no matter how brilliant we find chimps, dogs and dolphins.

Many have noted that there has long been the tantalizing language in the book of Genesis with respect to the wives of Seth and the potential enemies of Cain. We have the fossil record of Neanderthal populations and we don’t quite know how God regards them. That is of course God’s business, not our own. Divine regard is in fact the basis upon which we premise the renovation of the universe, anything short of this simply doesn’t stand up.

If you need a prooftext for my position I’ll offer Jesus’ debate with the Sadducees. Yhwh IS the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. If they are not dead to Yhwh then they are not dead. In this case their temporary lack of biological capacity because of death is not an impediment to Yhwh’s regard.

Can we through biology ascertain the moment of divine regard with respect to one corner of his creation? We can’t do this in the present. The science of genetic research is a wonderful thing that can help us in many terrific ways and figure out an enormous amount of human history. What it can’t do is establish divine regard. Divine regard can only be established by the mind of the creator and our knowledge of that judgment is dependent upon his informing us of it.

Now of course if there is no creator then there is no regard and if there is no regard this conversation is frankly moot because then humanity is merely the most dominant local species and the only ought of the species is the preservation of its own dominance.

Human culpability is established through divine regard. Biology cannot establish that regard because what is in the mind of God can’t be measured by genetic legacy.

Posted in philosophical reflection | 3 Comments

My post-rapture Thank You note to Harold Camping

http://www.thinkchristian.net/index.php/2011/05/22/a-post-rapture-thank-you-note-to-harold-camping/

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

May 20, 2012

I’m amazed at the legs that Harold Camping’s campaign has. My children are talking about it with their friends in school. Three Hispanic women who are primarily Spanish speakers quizzed me about it yesterday and I just got a random call from a 17 year old girl on the church line wanting to know if it is going to happen. She was afraid.

I know I’ll write more about this as the days progress. I’ve got a http://thinkchristian.net piece coming out possibly Sunday AM or Saturday on the subject, but a couple of fast reflections.

1. Good old fashioned angst about death is alive and well. Some people are troubled by this regardless of the source.

2. The media has power in terms of what people believe. Media is a validator and if its on the TV or on a billboard people are culturally conditioned to give it credibility, again regardless of other ways of evaluating the source.

3. Will fear prove to be an enduring motivator? I shared a number of things on the phone with the 17 year old girl, I prayed with her and she clearly was comforted after we spoke for ten minutes or so, but my confidence that this fear will move her towards a more enduring relationship with Jesus isn’t great. Fear energizes us in the short term, other things, especially joy, are needed for enduring fruit. I’m not saying seeds can’t be planted, but we’ve seen this kind of thing with 9/11 and other media events that prompt people to look for fast fixes for their fear. I invited her to church on Sunday. We’ll see if she shows. pvk

Posted in Culture commentary | Leave a comment

J.R.D. Kirk on Romans

I find this kind of overview very helpful. Here are the links to Kirk’s blog posts on Romans

http://www.jrdkirk.com/2011/04/23/law-in-romans-for-wrath/

http://www.jrdkirk.com/2011/04/25/law-in-romans-not-for-law-but-for-christ/

http://www.jrdkirk.com/2011/04/29/the-just-requirment-fulfilled/

Posted in Links, Understanding the Bible | Leave a comment

Review of Rob Bell’s “Love Wins”: Mind on heaven so they are no earthly good

There is a stereotype surrounding the idea that religious people who fix their hope on heaven are of no earthly good to the world today. You hear this a lot. It is intimated a number of time in Rob Bell’s “Love Wins”. It seems a logical position to hold. I think it is fallacious.

We should first clean up the question. A better question is whether people who believe that actions in this life have consequences, especially dramatic consequences after life as a group do more or less to improve the real life experience of people in this life. My suspicion is that in fact they do and is based on a variety of surveys throughout the years as well as personal, anecdotal experience.

First let me also say that I have also met some people who fit into the stereotype that all they care about is the after life and imagine that issues of this world, poverty, the environment, etc. don’t matter. They are out there, but I think they are the exception amidst groups of rigorous belief rather than the rule.

1. A number of years ago Gallup wrote a book called “The Saints Among Us” in which he noted that something like 13% of the population does most of the giving and volunteering. Some of this would be towards specifically religious ends, but others would be towards what we would call humanitarian ends. I have seen numerous surveys in fact that shows that for Americans regular church attendance is a good predictor not only of religious giving but also humanitarian giving. Look also at the groups that do most of the humanitarian work in the world today. In most cases those groups were started by religious groups who had specific and consequential assumptions about the connection between this world behavior and after life destiny.

2. It is easy to dismiss and disparage motivation based on fear of hell. Preaching hell-avoidance has not been the emphasis of my ministry and I don’t intend to start. Neither am I a believer in guilt based motivation. The reason is both doctrinal and experiential. The Heidelberg Catechism is one of the three doctrinal statements of my tradition and the motivational and experiential rubric of my tradition is misery, deliverance, gratitude. I believe gratitude is a better motivator of consistent, joyful generosity and I preach it every week. (Ask my congregation). I slip this into nearly every sermon.

Having said this self-interested motivation does work to a degree and I believe is a legitimate motivational devise. Jonathan Edwards called it “Common Virtue”. Jesus used it. Society uses it and without it life with people would be unlivable. We train dogs with it and we train children with it. It works. Even Penn Jillette, an outspoken atheist did an interesting YouTube video expressing that he only respects Christians who really believe in hell if they are up front about warning him about it. He’s an outspoken atheist but he is a very reasonable man. The doctor that fails to warn his patient about smoking and all kinds of other health risks is not doing his job. If Christians believe in hell then warning people about hell is a logical and loving thing to do. Christians of course should show some tact, diplomacy and wisdom, but its legitimate.

Giving to the poor is a basic expression of multiple religious traditions including Islam and Judaism. Many religious (including Christianity) warn its followers that turning away from the needs of the poor is a symptom of a heart that is not committed to God and potentially on the path to destruction. There are numerous stories from the New Testament about this. It’s part of the package. Therefore it stands to reason that Christians who believe in afterlife consequences will likely outperform others who do not have this belief in pursuing relief of the poor.

I once read an article in fact that did a study (I’ve been searching for this piece for a while now to note it) that found that cultures that had the threat of hell in their cultural tradition tended to outperform those that did not in terms of speed of economic development. Afterlife anxiety it seems does spur people on to energetic development of their lives in this world.

Also compare cultures that have a theology that validates a real, consistent world verses those that assert that this world experience (including evil) is fundamentally illusory and non-existent. Hindu and Buddhist cultures share an assertion that our experience is illusory and generally speaking they advise their spiritual athletes towards meditation to break the grip of this illusion to see that everything is one and that evil does not really exist. It is notable that science developed in the Abrahamic cultures in a way that it did not in these eastern cultures. Why devote ourselves to conditions in this world if the world as we see it and experience it doesn’t really exist.

3. Religious people who believe in after life consequences of this worldly behavior commit themselves to their religious institutions in a more vigorous way than those that tend towards universalism. They also tend to develop culture that is more rigorous. David Brooks made this point recently in a response to the Mormon Bible musical. Those who don’t believe in after life consequence don’t tend to attend church as regularly, give in a disciplined way or support other specifically religious organizations. These religious organizations tend to be very involved in humanitarian causes. Again, this isn’t just Christians it is Jewish, Mormon and Islam.

I also see in my own church that those most committed to the church also tend to be the most generous also towards humanitarian causes. Many of these people have the softest hearts and have a hard time turning down an appeal to help someone in need. Their levels of cynicism is lower and their habits of giving money away are rehearsed and deeply ingrained.

Again, all of this is a generalization. There are many examples of people without an belief in after-life consequences to this worldly behavior who are greatly philanthropic, but if you are going to make a generalization I think the evidence support the position that is actually contrary to a lot of people’s assumptions. Those who believe in after-life consequences (especially dramatic ones like hell) on average out perform those who have far more general sentiments like “good people go to heaven” and “good people” tends to include people they like and people in general, excluding people that have hurt them, people that have hurt children and genocidal dictators.

Posted in book review, theological | Tagged | 1 Comment