Mabel

This is from John Ortberg’s book “The Life You’ve Always Wanted“. It’s an amazing story he got from Tom Schmidt from pages 24-28

“The state-run convalescent hospital is not a pleasant place. It is large, understaffed, and overfilled with senile and helpless and lonely people who are waiting to die-. On the brightest of days it seems dark inside, and it smell of sickness and stale urine. I went there once or twice a week for four years, but I never wanted to go there, and I always left with a sense of relief. It is not the kind of place one gets used to.

“On this particular day I was walking in a hallway that I had not visited before, looking in vain for a few who were alive enough to receive a flower and a few words of encouragement. This hallway seemed to contain some of the worst cases, strapped onto carts or into wheelchairs and looking completely helpless.

“As I neared the end of this hallway, I saw an old woman strapped up in a wheelchair. Her face was an absolute horror. The empty stare and white pupils of her eyes told me that she was blind. The large hearing aid over one ear told me that she was almost deaf. One side of her face was being eaten by cancer. There was a discolored and running sore covering part of one cheek, and it had pushed her nose to one side, dropped one eye, and distorted her jaw so that what should have been the corner of her mouth was the bottom of her mouth. As a consequence, she drooled constantly. I was told later that when new nurses arrived, the supervisors would send them to feed this woman, thinking that if they could stand this sight they could stand anything in the building. I also learned later that this woman was eighty-nine years old and that she had been here, bedridden, blind, nearly deaf and alone,for twenty- five years. This was Mabel.

“I don’t know why I spoke to her—she looked less likely to respond than most of the people I saw in that hallway. But I put a flower in her hand and said, ‘Here is a flower for you. Happy Mother’s Day.’ She held the flower up to her face and tried to smell it, and then she spoke. And much to my surprise, her words, although somewhat garbled because of her deformity, were obviously produced by a clear mind. She said, ‘Thank you. It’s lovely. But can I give it to someone else? I can’t see it, you know, I’m blind.’

“I said, ‘Of course,’ and I pushed her in her chair back down the hallway to a place where I thought I could find some alert patients. I found one, and I stopped the chair. Mabel held out the flower and said, ‘Here, this is from Jesus.’

“That was when it began to dawn on me that this was not an ordinary human being. Later I wheeled her back to her room and learned more about her history. She had grown up on a small farm that she managed with only her mother until her mother died. Then she ran the farm alone until 1950 when her blindness and sickness sent her to the convalescent hospital. For twenty-five years she got weaker and sicker, with constant headaches, backaches, and stomach aches, and then the cancer came too. Her three roommates were all human vegetables who screamed occasionally but never talked. They often soiled their bedclothes, and because the hospital was understaffed, especially on Sundays when I usually visited, the stench was often overpowering.

“Mabel and I became friends over the next few weeks, and I went to see her once or twice a week for the next three years. Her first words to me were usually an offer of hard candy from a tissue box near her bed. Some days I would read to her from the Bible, and often when I would pause she would continue reciting the passage from memory, word-for-word. On other days I would take a book of hymns and sing with her, and she would know all the words of the old songs. For Mabel, these were not merely exercises in memory. She would often stop in mid-hymn and make a brief comment about lyrics she considered particularly relevant to her own situation. I never heard her speak of loneliness or pain except in the stress she placed on certain lines in certain hymns.

“It was not many weeks before I turned from a sense that I was being helpful to a sense of wonder, and I would go to her with a pen and paper to write down the things she would say….

“During one hectic week of final exams I was frustrated because my mind seemed to be pulled in ten directions at once with all of the things that I had to *think about. The question occurred to me, ‘What does Mabel have to think about—hour after hour, day after day, week after week, not even able to know if it’s day or night?’ So I went to her and asked, `Mabel, what do you think about when you lie here?’

“And she said, ‘I think about my Jesus.’

“I sat there, and thought for a moment about the difficulty, for me, of thinking about Jesus for even five minutes, and I asked, `What do you think about Jesus?’ She replied slowly and deliberately as I wrote. .

I think about how good he’s been to me. He’s been awfully good to me in my life, you know … I’m one of those kind who’s mostly satisfied…. Lots of folks wouldn’t care much for what I think. Lots of folks would think I’m kind of old- fashioned. But I don’t care. I’d rather have Jesus. He’s all the world to me.

“And then Mabel began to sing an old hymn:
Jesus is all the world to me,
My life, my joy, my all.
He is my strength from day to day, Without him I would fall.
When I am sad, to him I go,
No other one can cheer me so. When I am sad He makes me glad. He’s my friend.

“This is not fiction. Incredible as it may seem, a human being really lived like this. I know. I knew her. How could she do it? Seconds ticked and minutes crawled, and so did days and weeks and months and years of pain without human company and without an explanation of why it was all happening—and she lay there and sang hymns. How could she do it?

“The answer, I think, is that Mabel had something that you and I don’t have much of. She had power. Lying there in that bed, unable to move, unable to see, unable to hear, unable to talk to anyone, she had incredible power.”

Here was an ordinary human being who received supernatural power to do extraordinary things.

Here was an entire life consisted of following Jesus as best she could in her situation: patient endurance of suffering, solitude, prayer, meditation on Scripture, worship, fellowship when it was possible, giving when she had a flower or a piece of candy to offer.

Imagine being in her condition and saying,”I think about how good he’s been to me. He’s been awfully good to me in my life, you know. . . . I’m one of those kind who’s mostly satisfied.” This is the Twenty-third Psalm come to life: “The LORD is my shepherd, I shall not want.”

For anyone who really saw Mabel—who was willing to “turn aside”—a hospital bed became a burning bush; a place where this ordinary and pain-filled world was visited by the presence of God. When others saw the life in that hospital bed, they wanted to take off their shoes. The lid was off the terrarium. Then the turn came, with a catch of the breath, and a beating of the heart, and tears. They were standing on holy ground.
Do you believe such a life is possible for an ordinary human being?

“The state-run convalescent hospital is not a pleasant place. It is large, understaffed, and overfilled with senile and helpless and lonely

people who are waiting to die-. On the brightest of days it seems dark inside, and it smell of sickness and stale urine. f went there once or

twice a week for four years, but I never wanted to go there, and I always left with a sense of relief. It is not the kind of place one gets

used to.
“On this particular day I was walking in a hallway that I had not visited before, looking in vain for a few who were alive enough to receive

a flower and a few words of encouragement. This hallway seemed to contain some of the worst cases, strapped onto carts or into wheelchairs

and looking completely helpless.
“As I neared the end of this hallway, I saw an old woman strapped up in a wheelchair. Her face was an absolute horror. The empty stare and

white pupils of her eyes told me that she was blind. The large hearing aid over one ear told me that she was almost deaf. One side of her

face was being eaten by cancer. There was a discolored and running sore covering part of one cheek, and it had pushed her nose to one side,

dropped one eye, and distorted her jaw so that what should have been the corner of her mouth was the bottom of her mouth. As a consequence,

she drooled constantly. I was told later that when new nurses arrived, the supervisors would send them to feed this woman, thinking that if

they could stand this sight they could stand anything in the building. I also learned later that this woman was eighty-nine years old and

that she had been here, bedridden, blind, nearly deaf and alone,for twenty- five years. This was Mabel.
“I don’t know why I spoke to her—she looked less likely to respond than most of the people I saw in that hallway. But I put a flower in her

hand and said, ‘Here is a flower for you. Happy Mother’s Day.’ She held the flower up to her face and tried to smell it, and then she spoke.

And much to my surprise, her words, although somewhat garbled because of her deformity, were obviously produced by a clear mind. She said,

‘Thank you. It’s lovely. But can I give it to someone else? I can’t see it, you know, I’m blind.’
“I said, ‘Of course,’ and I pushed her in her chair back down the hallway to a place where I thought I could find some alert patients. I

found one, and I stopped the chair. Mabel held out the flower and said, ‘Here, this is from Jesus.’
“That was when it began to dawn on me that this was not an ordinary human being. Later I wheeled her back to her room and learned more about

her history. She had grown up on a small farm that she managed with only her mother until her mother died. Then she ran the farm alone until

1950 when her blindness and sickness sent her to the convalescent hospital. For twenty-five years she got weaker and sicker, with constant

headaches, backaches, and stomach aches, and then the cancer came too. Her three roommates were all human vegetables who screamed

occasionally but never talked. They often soiled their bedclothes, and because the hospital was understaffed, especially on Sundays when I

usually visited, the stench was often overpowering.
“Mabel and I became friends over the next few weeks, and I went to see her once or twice a week for the next three years. Her first words to

me were usually an offer of hard candy from a tissue box near her bed. Some days I would read to her from the Bible, and often when I would

pause she would continue reciting the passage from memory, word-for-word. On other days I would take a book of hymns and sing with her, and

she would know all the words of the old songs. For Mabel, these were not merely exercises in memory. She would often stop in mid-hymn and

make a brief comment about lyrics she considered particularly relevant to her own situation. I never heard her speak of loneliness or pain

except in the stress she placed on certain lines in certain hymns.
“It was not many weeks before I turned from a sense that I was being helpful to a sense of wonder, and I would go to her with a pen and paper

to write down the things she would say….
“During one hectic week of final exams I was frustrated because my mind seemed to be pulled in ten directions at once with all of the things

that I had to *think about. The question occurred to me, ‘What does Mabel have to think about—hour after hour, day after day, week after

week, not even able to know if it’s day or night?’ So I went to her and asked, `Mabel, what do you think about when you lie here?’
“And she said, ‘I think about my Jesus.’
“I sat there, and thought for a moment about the difficulty, for me, of thinking about Jesus for even five minutes, and I asked, `What do you

think about Jesus?’ She replied slowly and deliberately as I wrote. .
I think about how good he’s been to me. He’s been awfully good to me in my life, you know … I’m one of those kind who’s mostly

satisfied…. Lots of folks wouldn’t care much for what I think. Lots of folks would think I’m kind of old- fashioned. But I don’t care. I’d

rather have Jesus. He’s all the world to me.
“And then Mabel began to sing an old hymn:
Jesus is all the world to me,
My life, my joy, my all.
He is my strength from day to day, Without him I would fall.
When I am sad, to him I go,
No other one can cheer me so. When I am sad He makes me glad. He’s my friend.
“This is not fiction. Incredible as it may seem, a human being really lived like this. I know. I knew her. How could she do it? Seconds

ticked and minutes crawled, and so did days and weeks and months and years of pain without human company and without an explanation of why it

was all happening—and she lay there and sang hymns. How could she do it?
“The answer, I think, is that Mabel had something that you and I don’t have much of. She had power. Lying there in that bed, unable to move,

unable to see, unable to hear, unable to talk to anyone, she had incredible power.”
Here was an ordinary human being who received supernatural power to do extraordinary things.
Here was an entire life consisted of following Jesus as best she could in her situation: patient endurance of suffering, solitude, prayer,

meditation on Scripture, worship, fellowship when it was possible, giving when she had a flower or a piece of candy to offer.
Imagine being in her condition and saying,”I think about how good he’s been to me. He’s been awfully good to me in my life, you know. . . .

I’m one of those kind who’s mostly satisfied.” This is the Twenty-third Psalm come to life: “The LORD is my shepherd, I shall not want.”
For anyone who really saw Mabel—who was willing to “turn aside”—a hospital bed became a burning bush; a place where this ordinary and pain-

filled world was visited by the presence of God. When others saw the life in that hospital bed, they wanted to take off their shoes. The lid

was off the terrarium. Then the turn came, with a catch of the breath, and a beating of the heart, and tears. They were standing on holy

ground.
Do you believe such a life is possible for an ordinary human being?

Posted in Quotations | Comments Off on Mabel

Time and Pain

Part of why we doubt God is the relationship of time and pain. Pain is in fact all about time. When there is no time, there is no pain.

In Luke 13:6-9 the master of the fruitless fruit tree is in pain. He has committed that which he values, the soil, the water, he resources, his attention, to the goal of his desire: fruit. The tree, however, is uncooperative. The tree is not bowing to his will. The obvious answer is the annihilation of the tree. In a conflict between the tree and the master the tree always loses. It may have a woody stem, but it is no match for an iron ax and at least it is good for fuel. The equation is simple. The end result predictable.

As in any good story something interesting occurs. Another one speaks on behalf of the tree, a Lorax of sorts. This Lorax intercedes for the tree. Why? I can think of no other reason that that he loves the tree. The intercessor and the master both seek fruitfulness, but the Lorax has a love for the tree itself, the bark, the angle of the limbs, the leaves, and longs to see it bear fruit.

This is a story of pain. The fruitlessness of the tree causes pain to both the owner and the Lorax and both willingly commit to future pain on behalf of the tree. The master does so in terms of tolerance, forbearance, patience. The Lorax in terms of all those things plus labor. Both commit to travel through time and into pain on behalf of the fruitless tree.

What can we say of the tree? Why does it not bear fruit? A modern farmer might test the soil and seek a mechanistic solution to the problem. In deed the approach taken by the laborer will be practical. He will give it more water. He will fertilize the soil. But we all know this isn’t simply a story about a tree, it is a story about us. The fruitlessness is a troubling mystery for the master and the laborer. The tree SHOULD bear fruit. It is a fig tree, it has soil, it has sun, other trees are doing just fine. There is a problem with THIS tree! The tree should not be incapable of bearing fruit. Does the tree have a will, deciding it wishes to NOT serve the master or to accomplish what all of its genetics have made it capable of accomplishing? Fruitlessness is a mystery, a damnable mystery, an anomaly, and a temporary one.

The master and the laborer both take on pain on behalf of the tree. The tree likely does not understand the pain assumed on its behalf.

We all know that this isn’t simply a story about a tree and a couple of guys hungry for figs. The fig tree is Israel, the people of God and it has not born the fruit it was intended to produce. This way of story telling comes right out of the Old Testament, especially Isaiah 5. It is the story of us as individuals, the story of the people of God through time, and the story of the entire world. The master looked for justice but got bloodshed. He looked for righteousness but got cries of distress. The master sought joy, but got sorrow and there is no one else to blame but the fruitless tree.

We moderns have issues with God. The most common “issue” we have with God is his inaction. Why doesn’t God intervene? Why does God let all of this pain and bloodshed happen? We hear this a lot. Most of us think it too, sometimes a lot.

We have a dual problem though. This issue is reversed so often in our reading of the Old Testament. We read the Bible and we come to two interesting conclusions. First, that all these old stories are just a bunch of hooey because they are filled with God’s intervention. That’s simply ancient, ignorant people talking. People who didn’t have the “enlightened” position we possess to understand that fruit trees always produce fruit if you get the soil right. We certainly know better than they did, the poor unfortunates. We also are angry at this image of this interventionist God. He was never intervening as we so clearly know he should have. If he was any God worth worshiping at all his interventions would have looked totally different. Philistine spears would have turned to feather boas and Babylonians and Levites would have joined hands to sing “I’d like to give the world a Coke…” Certainly that’s how God should intervene.

The irony of course is that we are consummate interventionists who presume to be able to dictate to God the details of intervention yet all of our intervention has by no means eliminated the bloodshed and cries of distress. In fact a good amount of the bloodshed and cries of distress are a direct result of our interventions.

This picture from Jesus shows us a couple of things.

The master and the laborer suffer on behalf of a dumb tree. Like Abraham pleading for Sodom and Gomorrah the Lorax pleads the cause of the tree thought the tree deserves it not. Unlike Abraham this intercessor will also endure pain on behalf or the tree. Out of nothing but his love for his bark and its leaves it will labor longer on behalf of the tree in hope of fruitfulness.

The master and the laborer will willingly enter into time and pain, in fact a time of pain on behalf of the tree. These are not unmoved movers. They are moved and voluntarily endure on behalf of a plant that could be used to heat a room.

Their patience, however, does have an end. It would not be right for the master to wait forever. If the tree never produces it is in fact NOT a fig tree, it is an emblem of rebellion and disease. The joy of the master will not permanently be thwarted. The master’s pain will not be indefinite. It may be long, but not forever.

The real story is of course, however, the love of the Lorax. That love is the tree’s only hope. That love will move the laborer to do for the tree what the tree cannot do for itself. The tree cannot change its place in time and space. The tree cannot change the light energy of the sun.

Like many of Jesus’ stories the story ends unfinished. Will the tree produce fruit? We have a sense from the rest of Jesus’ stories that in fact the answer is left for us to give.

Posted in Devotional Reflection, Understanding the Bible | Comments Off on Time and Pain

On the Writing Off Of

We are creatures of time and space. We must prioritize our time, energy, resources, attention. When we write things, people, institutions off we make an economic decision. “I will invest in this, but not that.” We have to do this, it’s a function of what we are. A practical “writing off” is a necessity that all of us embrace every day. There is a deeper “writing off” in the heart, however, that is a different matter.

The complaint here is that some are writing off others. One group says to another “We don’t need you. You’re defective (unlike us). You either are something or you’ve done something or you’ve embraced something that justifies our exclusion of our, our attempt to marginalize you, our desire that you no longer factor into the world we wish to create.”

By virtue of this marvelous agency humanity’s been given, no one holds a monopoly on the capacity of “writing off”. Writing off initially seems to ask very little of us. It is a small mental re-categorization. We have simply slid one or more persons or classes of people into a small mental category of those beyond any hope of redemption. At least they can’t be redeemed UNLESS they become like us, think like us, embrace what we embrace, etc.

The ease of this “writing off” is an illusion. What we don’t realize is that it starts out looking cheap and easy, but over time becomes weighty and costly. Every writing off is seen as “justified”, “caused by the other”. Unfortunate consequences are always excused by “We had no choice. They deserve it because of their evil ways or beliefs.”

That exclusion needs to be maintained and the cost of its maintenance is the loss of hope for community and the growth of bitterness of heart. We have to continue to rehearse the writing off, the reasons for it and why it must be maintained. We marshal others to embrace this writing off. We mobilize institutions to enforce it with money and power. We write it down in ink that we hope cannot be erased. We pray our children will embrace our “writing off” after we are gone. It consumes us. It begins to define us.

The opposite of writing off is love, but love is hard too. pvk

Posted in Culture commentary | Comments Off on On the Writing Off Of

Twitter Updates for 2009-09-30

  • Back from CRHM board meetings in GR. heavy week ahead, likely not too many tweets coming from me. #
  • RT @lscrc: Why do we instinctively imagine that those who suffer calamity were morally deserving (and we aren't)? mp3 http://bit.ly/xIsiE #
  • RT @lscrc: The second beast of Rev 13, religion teams up with empire, and 666 mp3 bible study http://bit.ly/4kNgdB #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-09-30

Twitter Updates for 2009-09-20

  • RT @JohnPiper: God is the only Person for whom self-exaltation is an act of love. "He exalts himself to show mercy to you" (Isaiah 30:18). #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-09-20

Twitter Updates for 2009-09-19

Powered by Twitter Tools

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-09-19

Twitter Updates for 2009-09-18

  • RT @alanhirsch: We look for leaders that will serve. Jesus is looking for servants that will lead – Neil Cole #
  • RT @praxishabitus: Terry Eagleton: "new atheists" like Dawkins & Hitchens "buy their rejection of religion on the cheap" http://ow.ly/pSMg #
  • RT @JohnPiper: Does it matter to a man dying in the desert by which choice of route he missed the only well? C. S. Lewis #
  • RT @praxishabitus: How immigrants are affecting US religion – Boston.com http://ow.ly/pSKS #
  • RT @ahc: U2 wields amazing cultural power. What I saw at their concert (and how Bono is different from Steve Jobs) . . . http://bit.ly/i2F8R #
  • RT @craigadams49: When did “evangelism” become “marketing?” http://bit.ly/13ANEH via @doroteos2 #
  • Parents of teens, most of what you're doing is wrong, and it's still probably OK Salon http://bit.ly/8j3A9 #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-09-18

To Know Good and Evil

I’m in Revelation 13 in my Adult Sunday School class. Revelation 13:7 says that the beast, the empire/proxy of the dragon was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. Isn’t that a strange verse? Why would God not only allow the dragon to create his evil outpost of resistance on earth after being thrown out of heaven (chapter 12) but also allow his proxy to defeat the saints?

Adam and Eve ate from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. We wanted to know good and evil and the tree started the process of giving us what we said we wanted. Our difficulty, however, is that we often get good and evil mixed up. Most of the evil that is done is in a quest for good. People don’t seek evil, they only tolerate it or think it excusable because they are questing for good.

People sometimes wonder why the fall won’t happen all over again? How do we know that in the age to come we won’t somehow simply decide to replay the scene at the tree? I think Revelation 13 helps us here.

Most of us have a knife drawer in our kitchens. We walk past that drawer every day and never think a thing of it. That drawer is filled with knives that are sharp and with those knives we could easily disembowel ourselves yet we don’t fear the drawer. We don’t go to bed thanking God that he got us through another day where we narrowly avoided disemboweling ourselves. Now of course there may be some for whom this is true, and that is a hard and sad thing for them, but for most of us it is a non-issue. It is a non-issue because to harm ourselves with those knives would be unthinkable. Why would we do such a thing?

God allows the beast the freedom to conquer the saints, just like he gave Pharaoh the freedom to enslave Jacob’s children. Pharoah and the beast are God given clarifiers for the church. They give us what we asked for at the tree, to know good and evil. The problem is that we are slow learners and all too often it isn’t until evil is fully blown that we finally begin to recognize it. We also begin to recognize that we are often way outmatched by it. We are small and weak and too often powerless to stop it. The beast wars and the beast conquers.

We do know the end of the story, it comes repeatedly in the book of Revelation. The truth is that the dragon, the power behind the beast has already been beaten and his time is short. He puts on a good show but his exile is a foregone conclusion. God allows him to conquer the saints for the good of the saints. The saints through their suffering grow in substance and strength. They learn the “good and evil” lesson well so that in Creation 2.0 our insanity of Creation 1.0 won’t be repeated even though we’ll be perfectly free. Sin will look like the silly threat of a knife drawer.

My lessons of good and evil are not yet through and I’m not really looking forward to lessons I have yet to face, but the story gives me hope of a victory won on my behalf that has already been accomplished. It plants a seed in my imagination that is still too thin and dim. The more the beast rages the clearer it becomes, but ever so slowly.

Posted in Devotional Reflection, Understanding the Bible | Comments Off on To Know Good and Evil

Twitter Updates for 2009-09-16

  • RT @JohnA1949: Mission is gospel not law: it is the overflow of a great gift, not the carrying of a great burden–Lesslie Newbigin #
  • RT @anchebrewpoetry: Ten Astounding Facts and Figures: A Reality Check for Believers and Atheists: http://twurl.nl/hpgqbq #
  • RT @cicw: RT @ChristianCent Phil Jenkins on the fate of religion and the religious in failed states: http://bit.ly/Fw3gX #cicwrt #
  • If we're naive about our own supposed "free will" how cock sure can we be about the details of God's agency? http://bit.ly/h9bsi #
  • RT @lscrc: Rev 13 mp3 study: the beast conquers the saints finishing our schooling in the knowledge of good and evil http://bit.ly/1eo4e #
  • RT @lscrc: Jesus knew that people would not coexist in the wake of his declaration. Why we oppose our own rescue. mp3 http://bit.ly/1YlVx #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-09-16

Traditions are Trans-time Communities

On Sept 14 Rachel Held Evans, a young author awaiting the publication of her first book from Zondervans posted “Why Calvinism Makes Me Cry” on her blog. There are a number of her comments that I’d like to respond to and use them to as a backdrop to role out some more recent thoughts of my own. I’m going to keep this piece separate from the larger issues I want to deal with. It’s probably the least important of what I want to say.

It was suggested that perhaps some of what she was objecting to was better attributed to “hyper-Calvinists” rather than “Calvinists”. She said, “Folks are always telling me that my problem is with hyper-Calvinism, not Calvinism…but I guess I’m having trouble making a clear distinction. I usually counter with, “hyper-Calvinists are just consistent Calvinists,”

Traditions are communities that travel through time. There are two important aspects to that definition: the “communities” aspect and the “time” aspect. First on “communities”

People sometimes self-identify with communities, sometimes they are identified with communities by someone else. Sometimes the entire community is identified by people who don’t want to be identified with it. Given all of this the questions of definition, whose in and whose out is always a matter of debate.

When you add to this the 4th dimension, time, the labeling gets even more difficult. When we want to talk about “Calvinism” one of the definitions we must immediately wrestle with is “who was John Calvin and what really did he believe?” Given the fact that Calvin wrote and published books, we might imagine that this isn’t a difficult task. Anyone who imagines this has never been around historians. The answer to the question “who was John Calvin and what did he think” continues to be worked on.

This doesn’t mean that everything is relative, but it does mean that there are degrees of precision required for a discussion. Part of what we also know is that John Calvin himself is not a static target. He like many of us had thoughts and ideas that evolved, and the specific language he used to address one thing may have differed according to whom and when he was addressing a person or a topic. In other words, there are things we can say with great certainty and precision about John Calvin, as well as things we can say with less precision.

When it comes to describing a trans-historical community described under the label of “Calvinism”, the complexity of the task expands exponentially. What aspect of Calvin’s work or thought defines this community? Would Calvin have seen that aspect as crucial or are we to rely on the opinions of later followers and which followers?

Since traditions are communities are made up of people, we also expect that there will be ranges of ideas over which they will disagree and debate. Some will debate what Calvin thought about something, others will simply agree with him on many things and disagree on others.

Often the hypothetical exercise of asking “what would Calvin think of such and such today” comes into play. I don’t deny that this can be a helpful thought experiment but it is a highly speculative one. Calvin’s thought and language were part of his world. We have the benefit of knowing something of his world, but he never had the benefit of knowing anything of ours. Truth is, without the limitations of his limited historical existence Calvin simply would have been John Calvin. Introduce a translation of Huxley’s “Brave New World” into the French of Calvin’s day to Calvin and quite possibly we would not have the same Calvin. If Calvin traveled to our world quite likely we wouldn’t want to take him to the beach. If we traveled to Calvin’s world quite likely he shouldn’t to take us to the meat market or the doctor.

Part of what this time warp does to communities is a rather scary thing that keeps historians in work. We understand elements of his world through approximate translations into our world and we start to work with them. Now that is a wonderful thing because what it allows is for us to think thoughts that we likely would not think if we couldn’t do this sort of literary traveling back into time. It allowed Calvin to acquire Augustine and the writings of Paul. It allowed Bavinck to acquire the writings of Calvin and Augustine and do his own work, and on we go. That’s a terrific thing. If we don’t commune with people from the past within a tradition, we are unconscious prisoners of the moment. This gift, however, comes at a price. The Calvin we commune with is our Calvin to a degree and not his own. Competent scholars will always wrestle with this, hopefully within the context of a broader community working on the same thing, and often the details are or only seem irrelevant to others not as familiar with the deep workings of the thought, but it is important nevertheless. Again, this is the work of the historian, to continue to better understand the person within their past context in order to make as accurate a thought translation to the present as possible.

Within these communities with all of this complexity we will have a rich diversity of thinking. Jonathan Edwards was a Calvinist, but he was not Calvin. Bavinck and Kuyper were Calvinists, but they were not Calvin. They differed with Calvin on some things, and not on others. Together the form a tradition acceptably labeled by many, but not always by all.

Posted in Culture commentary, philosophical reflection | Comments Off on Traditions are Trans-time Communities