Leadingchurch.com

https://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/article/f1d7fed0-4ddf-4a8a-94b9-ea05f913cdd2

http://skidmorenews.com/new-blog/2018/4/17/a-heated-chat-by-the-fireside-peterson-revisited

https://reason.com/reasontv/2018/04/17/stossel-jordan-peterson-on-finding-meani

http://www.newsweek.com/hairdresser-who-deliberately-infected-men-hiv-virus-jailed-life-891450

Neutrality isn’t ever neutral.

https://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2018/march/april-holm-kingdom-divided-evangelicals-civil-war.html

Messianic outfit from Oklahoma http://www.grafted.faith/

http://quillette.com/2018/04/15/stifling-uniformity-literary-theory/

The gist of Levin’s critique was that feminist readings of Shakespeare all seemed to reach similar conclusions. In his own words, ‘the themes employed in [feminist] interpretations are basically the same. Although the terminology may vary, these criticisms all find that [Shakespeare’s] plays are about the role of gender in the individual and society’

This is not a scientific hypothesis that can be falsified or a philosophical argument that can be countered with other philosophical arguments, it is more of a theological proposition. In fact, it functions in a near identical way to John Calvin’s notion of ‘total depravity’ and original sin:

To man we assign only this: that he pollutes and contaminates by his impurity those very things which were good. For nothing proceeds from a man, however perfect he be, that is not defiled by some spot.⁹