Leadingchurch.com

https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-liberal-crackup-1502456857

https://twitter.com/JonHaidt/status/896073921329373185

https://www.peteenns.com/teaching-bible-college-students-seemed-like-good-idea-time/

https://mereorthodoxy.com/book-review-two-kingdoms-guide-perplexed-brad-littlejohn/

Creation and redemption each has its ontological and its epistemological aspect. There is the created order and there is natural knowledge; there is the new creation and there is revelation in Christ. This has encouraged a confusion of the ontological and epistemological in much modern theology, so that we are constantly presented with the unacceptable polarized choice between an ethic that is revealed and has no ontological grounding and an ethic that is based on creation and so is naturally known. This polarization deprives redemption and revelation of their proper theological meaning as the divine reaffirmation of created order. If, on the other hand, it is the gospel of the resurrection that assures us of the stability and permanence of the world which God has made, then neither of the polarized options is right. In the sphere of revelation, we will conclude, and only there, can we see the natural order as it really is and overcome the epistemological barriers to an ethic that conforms to nature. This nature involves all men, and indeed … does not exclude a certain “natural knowledge” which is also part of man’s created endowment. And yet only in Christ do we apprehend that order in which we stand and that knowledge of it with which we have been endowed.²

https://christandpopculture.com/advent-drive-church-not-ridiculous-definitely-needed-thing/

https://www.circeinstitute.org/blog/how-quit-going-church