Top Posts
- Tim Keller: "Our Call: Holy Living"
- TLC (This Little Corner) Starter's Kit
- CS Lewis Meditation on the Third Commandment
- Links to Paul Vander Klay's Work
- Miroslav Volf on God's violence or ours
- Wisdom: What is It? by Tim Keller (What is the Fear of the LORD: Negative Fear vs. Positive Fear)
- A Canticle for Liebowitz Playlist
- Bertrand Russell's Free Man's Religion Quotations
- My John Suk Fantasy
- Living Water in the Age of Decay
Category Cloud
Blog note book review book writing CRC Culture commentary Daily Links and Notes Devotional Reflection How to become a Christian Institutional Church Link Compilations Links Missional On the way to Sunday's sermon Pastoral Identity philosophical reflection Quotations Saved Blog Comments Saved CRCVoices Posts Sermon Illustrations Sermon Outline Sermon Recordings Tech tools theological the self Tweets Uncategorized Understanding the Bible Video Wisdom YouTube Comments to RememberTag Cloud
- Abortion
- Acts
- Advent
- Advent 2014
- age of decay
- age to come
- Benedict Option
- book of Leviticus
- Calvin College
- Charles Taylor
- Christianity
- Christmas
- City Church San Francisco
- Confessional conversation
- CS Lewis
- David Brooks
- Donald Trump
- Douthat
- Dreher
- Esther
- Exodus
- faith
- Genesis
- hell
- Inspire2017
- James
- Jesus
- John Suk
- Jonathan Haidt
- Jordan Peterson
- Katy Perry
- Keller
- Kierkegaard
- King David
- King Saul
- Lent
- Leviticus
- Meme of the week
- Moses
- NT Wright
- Palm Sunday
- Pentecost
- Peter Enns
- Peter Kreeft
- Pope Francis
- Progressive Liberationism
- raising of lazarus
- RCA
- reflected self
- relational polarity
- Religion
- resurrection
- Rob Bell
- Rod Dreher
- Ryan Bell
- Skye Jethani
- SSM
- Steve Jobs
- Synod2015
- Synod2016
- the book of exodus
- The Book of Judges
- The book of Kings
- The book of Leviticus
- The Book of Luke
- the book of Numbers
- The Book of Samuel
- the Gospel of John
- The Gospel of Matthew
- The Road to Character
- the self book
- The Ten Commandments
- Tim Keller
- Tom Holland
- transgender
Twitter Feed
Tweets by paulvanderklay
How to live when the Age of Decay crushes your Utopian Dream
American Longing for Utopia

There was a very interesting piece in the New Yorker this week reviewing two recent books on American Utopian communities. Two of the communities most Americans with some knowledge of history would know would be the Oneida community and the Shaker sect.
It’s interesting what these communities did and didn’t have in common. Both were “Christian” sects in that they believed some variant of the Christian story. Both were utopian and their utopias were related to beliefs about Jesus’ second coming. The Oneida community believed that Jesus had come in 70AD and that we were living in “the millennium” and that their community should reflect the triumph of Jesus over sin. The Shakers were also “millennial” but they imagined an immanent return of Jesus. Both communities were ardently committed to equality of the sexes but while the Shakers were asexual in many ways the Oneida community was polyamorous. Both communities imagined that they were building the kingdom of God in their midst and that their way of life was a precursor of the new creation that was about to come upon the whole world. Both communities are now extent leaving with us artifacts of their ideals, on in silverware and the other in furniture and architecture.
It shouldn’t be a surprise that both of these communities were derivative of the larger Christian narrative. Christianity has within its story a very utopian strain. We believe that Jesus will return to judge the living and the dead and that the coming of the kingdom of God will mean that lions will lay down with lambs and all tears will be wiped away.
Many skeptics upon hearing this will scoff and note that the 2000 year non-return of Jesus and the 2000 year no-show of utopia are strong arguments that the Christian story is not true.
I would suggest, however, that utopian longings are deep within the American psyche and that atheist and secular people themselves, who have no narrative justification to long for such a reality themselves can’t let it go. If you are a strict materialist asserting that there is no providential hand guiding history to a better future then the kind of progressivist talk we find in politics and morality should be denounced as heresy to atheist belief. There can be no “better future for us” only a future that I find more pleasing and there is certainly no assurance that a better communal future will arrive. The only assurance we have is that at some point in the distant future the universe will grow cold and all that you love will be gone and forgotten. Your only comfort is that you will grow cold, forget and be forgotten long before that great end arrives, but this isn’t where we go.
Presidential campaigns that strike this nation as a fever every four years are full of both apocalypse and utopia. Each candidate promises that only their coming will bring utopia and warns that their rival will only bring apocalypse. They promise that the destiny is in our hands even though we know that voters in Ohio and Florida hold more power than we do here in California.
While Donald Trump has a sort of throw-back campaign slogan, “Make American Great AGAIN” his less superlative laden opponent tends to be on the side of a progressive liberationist utopia where our science and our knowledge and our freedom and our morality will create a society where each of us as individuals can have a shot at our best life now.
David and the Longing for Utopia Continue reading
University of Toronto Psych Prof won’t bow to Pronoun Demands
JP: No. I didn’t say that actually. If I’m going to be accused of saying things I have to be accused of exactly what I said. There’s not enough evidence to make the case that gender identity and biological sexuality are independently varying constructs. In fact, all the evidence suggests that they’re not independently varying constructs. I can tell you that transgender people make the same argument. They make the argument that a man can be born in a woman’s body and that’s actually an argument that specifies a biological linkage between gender identity and biological sex. I’m also not objecting to transgender people. I’m objecting to poorly written legislation and the foisting of ideological motivated legislation on a population that’s not ready for it.
CO: Well, transgender people are ready for it and they have been feeling a great deal of discrimination and that’s why they were seeking this type of redress in the law. Do you appreciate that?
JP: I don’t believe that the redress that they’re seeking in the law is going to actually improve their status materially. I think, in fact, it will have the opposite effect. I believe that the principles on which the legislation is predicated are sufficiently incoherent and vague to cause endless legal trouble in a matter that will not benefit transgender people.
Posted in Daily Links and Notes
Leave a comment