Links and Notes for April 5

Peter Berger notes the death of one of the Death of God theologians.

The text to the song “I Serve a Risen Savior” or “He Lives“. Interesting note on the wikipedia article how some conservative Christians have protested the hymn. From the book “Wonderful Words of Life”

In the book “Wonderful Words of Life: Hymns in American Protestant history and theology” Susan Wise Bauer notes that her first Easter at Westminster Theological Seminary in Philadelphia she suggested this song to the campus music director his response surprised her.

“I certainly hope that’s not the basis of your faith. That’s not how you know Christ is risen! We have the testimony of the eyewitnesses! We have the account in Scripture! We have the changed behavior of the disciples! To say that you just know he lives within your heart is to appeal to experience. That can led you to straight to liberal heresy!” (p. 205)

This piece by David Brooks about a man who wrote heroically about caring for his wife with Alzheimer’s and now 5 months later takes her life and his own should be read. There is much to ponder in this piece. Tim Stafford’s take on caring for his father with Alzheimer’s.

A piece on the appeal to Josephus to dispel the notion that Jesus’ existence and crucifixion was a mere legend.

Posted in Links, Quotations | Leave a comment

Links and Notes for April 4

NYT: Puberty before 10 the new normal? 

Neil de Koning on the Foolishness of God and the paucity of obvious pragmatic solutions found in Holy Week. 

Review of when God Talks Back. A very interesting review of the shape of piety in the Vineyard tradition and in my opinion much more broadly in evangelicalism, and un-reflectively so.

Some people won’t like this article. It strikes too close to home. Others will agree. There’s a lot in that piece.

 

 

Posted in Links, Quotations | Leave a comment

Notes from Tim Keller’s Sermon “Joy”

This was part of Keller’s series on the fruit of the Spirit entitled “Real Signs of the Spirit”. This sermon was on Joy and was preached on April 18, 2010. The text was Romans 5:1-11

Series Review:

One of the premises of the Bible (the theme of the series) is that there is a difference between a morally restrained heart by the power of will power and the supernatural change that the Holy Spirit gives. How do you know which is true of you.

The Three Points

  1. That joy is important
  2. That Christian joy is unique
  3. Where Christian joy comes from

Joy is Important

  • Every other religion says “live as you ought and God will accept you.” Christianity says you receive God’s acceptance and blessing as a free gift of faith on the basis of Jesus’ record, not your record, and then you can live as you ought. Total reversal! To be a Christian is to be someone who’s now justified by faith, at peace with God, accepted by him. Now what is the main mark of a real Christian life. Now we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God, in our suffering, and in God.
  • John Stott in his commentary on Romans (The Bible Speaks Today). “It seems clear from this paragraph that the main mark of justified believers is joy.”
  • To live life you need a center of joy.  A lot of people don’t believe that. They believe that pursuing joy is a dead end.
  • There’s been a lot of happiness studies. Lots of self help stuff. The intelligentsia hate all of that talk. Amy Bloom wrote in the NY Times essay The Rap on Happiness . (Here’s the whole quote, Keller abbreviates it.) Smart people often talk trash about happiness, and worse than trash about books on happiness, and they have been doing so for centuries — just as long as other people have been pursuing happiness and writing books about it. The fashion is to bemoan happiness studies and positive psychology as being the work not of the Devil (the Devil is kind of cool), but of morons. “No mockery in this world ever sounds to me so hollow as that of being told to cultivate happiness,” Charlotte Brontë wrote in 1853. “What does such advice mean? Happiness is not a potato, to be planted in mould and tilled with manure.” 
  • (Keller then abbreviates another quote from the end of the article.) The real problem with happiness is neither its pursuers nor their books; it’s happiness itself. Happiness is like beauty: part of its glory lies in its transience. It is deep but often brief (as Frost would have it), and much great prose and poetry make note of this. Frank Kermode wrote, “It seems there is a sort of calamity built into the texture of life.” To hold happiness is to hold the understanding that the world passes away from us, that the petals fall and the beloved dies. No amount of mockery, no amount of fashionable scowling will keep any of us from knowing and savoring the pleasure of the sun on our faces or save us from the adult understanding that it cannot last forever.
  • What she’s saying is this. If you really want serenity in life don’t pursue happiness because anything you get joy from will not last. No matter what it is it will disappoint you. The only way to get serenity is to not to try to be happy, not to try to pursue joy.
  • “I understand this…” Baseball illustration of being a boy whose joy was the Philadelphia Phillies. The Phillies lost 10 in a row.  What I said was, ‘never again! I’m never giving my heart to ________________.
  • For some sports teams are still breaking our hearts, but for most of the rest of us it’s a man or a woman, it’s love or a career or success. What happens is, because our hearts want joy, our hearts are a big vacuum pump, that has an enormous amount of sucking and it fixes itself on something and says ‘this will really make me happy’ but we know it will not last. Then you say ‘the only way I’ll get serenity is to stop pursuing joy. and get what philosophers and Buddhism is about. The old philosophers were all about detachment. Don’t give your heart to anything. But there’s a problem with that.
  • Joseph Epstein, retired professor of English, wrote an article in the Notre Dame magazine.  (I’ll put the quote below in it’s entirety.)

In the last stage of life, even with the cheeriest outlook, it isn’t easy to keep thoughts of death at bay. Consider, though, the advice of the Greek philosopher Epicurus (341-270 B.C.), who lent his name to the school of Epicureanism but who was, in my reading of him, the world’s first shrink. Epicureanism is generally understood to be about indulging fleshly pleasures, especially those of food and drink, but it is, I think, more correctly understood as the search for serenity.

Epicurus, who met with friends (disciples, really) in his garden in Athens, devised a program to rid the world of anxiety. His method, like most methods of personal reform, had set steps, in this case four such steps. Here they are:

Step One: Do not believe in God, or in the gods. They most likely do not exist, and even if they did, it is preposterous to believe that they could possibly care, that they are watching over you and keeping a strict accounting of your behavior.

Step Two: Don’t worry about death. Death, be assured, is oblivion, a condition not different from your life before you were born: an utter blank. Forget about heaven, forget about hell; neither exists — after death there is only the Big O (oblivion) and the Big N (nullity), nothing, nada, zilch. Get your mind off it.

Step Three: Forget, as best you are able, about pain. Pain is either brief, and will therefore soon enough diminish and be gone; or, if it doesn’t disappear, if it lingers and intensifies, death cannot be far away, and so your worries are over here, too, for death, as we know, also presents no problem, being nothing more than eternal dark, dreamless sleep.

Step Four: Do not waste your time attempting to acquire exactious luxuries, whose pleasures are sure to be incommensurate with the effort required to gain them. From this it follows that ambition generally — for things, money, fame, power — should also be foresworn. The effort required to obtain them is too great; the game isn’t worth the candle.

To summarize, then: forget about God, death, pain and acquisition, and your worries are over. There you have it, Epicurus’ Four-Step Program to eliminate anxiety and attain serenity. I’ve not kitchen-tested it myself, but my guess is that, if one could bring it off, this program really would work.

But the real question is, even if it did work, would such utter detachment from life, from its large questions and daily dramas, constitute a life rich and complex enough to be worth living? Many people would say yes. I am myself not among them.

  • CS Lewis said it better. From the Four Loves . (again here is the full quote, Keller summarizes)
  • To love at all is to be vulnerable. Love anything, and your heart will certainly be wrung and possibly be broken. If you want to make sure of keeping it intact, you must give your heart to no one, not even to an animal. Wrap it carefully round with hobbies and little luxuries; avoid all entanglements; lock it up safe in the casket or coffin of your selfishness. But in that casket — safe, dark, motionless, airless — it will change. It will not be broken; it will become unbreakable, impenetrable, irredeemable. The alternative to tragedy, or at least to the risk of tragedy, is damnation. The only place outside of Heaven where you can be perfectly safe from all the dangers and perturbations of love is Hell.
  • If you seek joy your heart will be broken. If you detach it dehumanizes you. It hardens you. Is there any way forward?

Christian Joy is Unique

  • Two ways Christian joy is unique.
  • a. Christian joy is not based in circumstances. 
  • We rejoice in our sufferings! vs. 3
  • Suffering is favorable circumstances going away.
  • I’m going to part ways with the word happiness because I don’t believe that Christian joy is what the world calls happiness.
  • What the world calls happiness is getting control of your life so that you keep your circumstances favorable.
  • Do you know that there is a happiness dot com? (Keller gets the citation wrong here. It is in the Rap on Happinessarticle above. )

We could canvass Gore, Rubin, Gilbert, the Dalai Lama and the many authors on the happier.com Web site and produce the Fundamentally Sound, Sure-Fire Top Five Components of Happiness: (1) Be in possession of the basics — food, shelter, good health, safety. (2) Get enough sleep. (3) Have relationships that matter to you. (4) Take compassionate care of others and of yourself. (5) Have work or an interest that engages you.

  • Do you realize how ridiculous this is? Sure you need all of this to be happy. Most people, most places, most centuries have never had this. What are we going to do about all of the people who will never get these things today. They never will have it. Talk about engaging in interesting work?
  • The world believes that happiness is getting my circumstances in the right place. I’m happy if things are going well, circumstances are favorable. What about most of the people in most of the times and most of the places that never have favorable circumstances like that. Are they doomed to unhappiness? Yes, as you and I define happiness in this culture today, but joy is available to them.
  • That Christian joy is not based on circumstances at all. In fact when it says “we rejoice in suffering” it doesn’t mean you rejoice for your suffering. That’s masochism, forget that one. (Keller is SO NY/NJ east coast… 🙂 ) How can you rejoice in your suffering if all your circumstances are going bad? vs. 11. You rejoice in God, and he’s not subject to circumstances. You rejoice in suffering because suffering produces stronger endurance, perseverance, character, and that leads to more hope and that hope is in the future glory of God.
  • Christian joy, unlike worldly happiness not only can be maintained when all circumstances go unfavorable, but it can also grow, in fact it does usually grow.
  • you say ‘how can that be?’ Worldly happiness goes away when things are bad because it’s based when things are bad. Christian joy can actually get stronger. How?
  • Your mother used to say, “don’t eat that candy before meals. It will ruin your appetite. The trouble with eating candy is it gives you a sugar buzz and masks the fact that your body needs stuff you don’t have. Sex, and money and power and success, favorable circumstances are spiritual sugar. What happens to Christians is you say ‘oh I believe in God and I know I’m going to heaven…’ but you actually base your day to day joy and happiness on circumstances and when they go away it drives you into God, because when the sugar goes away, when the candy goes away you’re forced to go after the feast your soul really needs. When things go bad it drives you into God and you develop a poise, a power, a strong kind of joy that never goes away regardless of circumstances.
  • b. Christian joy is unique because it’s already but not yet. 
  • On the one hand vs. 2b says we rejoice in the hope of the glory of God. When you become a Christian because your salvation is not based in your good works or your efforts there is a certainty you’ve got about your future. All other religions say ‘if you live as you ought God will bless you.”
  • If you believe the reason God blesses you is because you’ve lived a good life and I’m praying, etc. that means you have no certainty about your future spiritually speaking because what if you give up or what if you don’t keep it up? You can’t be sure because you haven’t gotten to the end yet. Religion earned by you creates an uncertainty about your future.
  • Christianity says there is no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. It’s absolutely certain you will share in the hope and glory of God. When you get to the renewed earth you’ll learn that this is your real country. You belong here. The knowledge of that future glory (hope).
  • Hope in the Bible is life shaping certainty of what you’re going to have but you don’t have it yet. It is grounding. It is poise creating when other circumstances are becoming unfavorable. But is that all we have? No, we have more.
  • Vs. 4 and 5. because God has poured out his love into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who he has given us.
  • What does that word “pour out” mean? it’s a way of expressing experience. Sometimes we get an hors d’oeurve of that feast now. Sometimes you experience that glory now. It’s at the heart of the Christian joy, a foretaste of that glory.
  • Richards Sibbes Sometimes our spirits cannot stand in trials. Therefore sometimes the immediate testimony of the Spirit is necessary. It comes in saying, ‘I am thy salvation!’ and our hearts are stirred up and comforted with joy inexpressible. This joy hath degrees. Sometimes it is so clear and strong that we question nothing — other times doubts come in soon.
  • William Guthrie10. I speak with the experience of many saints, and, I hope, according to Scripture, if I say there is a communication of the Spirit of God which is sometimes vouchsafed to some of His people that is somewhat besides, if not beyond, that witnessing of a sonship spoken of before. It is a glorious divine manifestation of God unto the soul, shedding abroad God’s love in the heart; it is a thing better felt than spoken of: it is no audible voice, but it is a ray of glory filling the soul with God, as He is life, light, love, and liberty, corresponding to that audible voice, ‘O man, greatly beloved’ (Dan. 9: 23); putting a man in a transport with this on his heart, ‘It is good to be here.’ (Matt. 17: 4.) It is that which went out from Christ to Mary, when He but mentioned her name– ‘Jesus saith unto her, Mary. She turned herself, and saith unto Him, Rabboni, which is to say, Master.’ (John 20: 16.) He had spoken some words to her before, and she understood not that it was He: but when He uttereth this one word “Mary”, there was some admirable divine conveyance and manifestation made out unto her heart, by which she was so satisfyingly filled, that there was no place for arguing and disputing whether or no that was Christ, and if she had any interest in Him. That manifestation wrought faith to itself, and did purchase credit and trust to itself, and was equivalent with, ‘Thus saith the Lord.’ This is such a glance of glory, that it may in the highest sense be called ‘the earnest,’ or first-fruits ‘of the inheritance’ (Eph. 1: 14); for it is a present, and, as it were, sensible discovery of the holy God, almost wholly conforming the man unto His likeness; so swallowing him up, that he forgetteth all things except the present manifestation. O how glorious is this manifestation of the Spirit!
  • Unless you have this joy you will rely on worldly happiness based on favorable circumstances which is so fragile. You will not have Christian joy unless you have experiences of the love of God direct to your heart through prayer. It’s the already foretaste of the not yet. It doesn’t happen a lot, or constantly, but you know it.
  • That goes along with your knowledge of the glory of God, but at the same time I have a subjective nature and Christian joy gives you what you need both head and heart.
  • This answers the dilemma of the first point. The first point dilemma was that things in this world are great and yet if we give our heart to them we get disappointed so then we detach and we  don’t rejoice in things.
  • CS Lewis’ autobiography is called “Surprised by Joy”. Before he was a Christian he was always trying to find joy in other things and before he became a Christian he binged on things that gave him joy. The first time he read an icelandic saga he loved it. He reads every Icelandic saga, and learns old Norse so he can read it in the original. As he works through it he realizes it isn’t paying out as he’d hoped. Then he gets a friend and binge on the friend but then the friend backs off. At one point he starts to realize that there’s a God behind the joy. (The citation comes from the Weight of Glory.)
  • “We cannot tell it because it is a desire for something that has never actually appeared in our experience. We cannot hide it because our experience is constantly suggesting it, and we betray ourselves like lovers at the mention of a name. Our commonest expedient is to call it beauty… The books or music in which we thought the beauty was located will betray us if we trust to them; it was not in them, it only came through them, and what came through them was longing. These things – the beauty, the memory of our own past – are good images of what we really desire; but if they are mistaken for the thing itself they turn into dumb idols, breaking the hearts of their worshippers. For they are not the thing itself; they are only the scent of a flower we have not found, the echo of a tune we have not heard, news from a country we have never visited.”
  • Then the conclusion from Surprised by Joy

But what, in conclusion, of Joy? for that, after all, is what the story has mainly been about. To tell you the truth, the subject has lost nearly all interest for me since I became a Christian… I believe that the old stab, the old bittersweet, has come to me as often and as sharply since my conversion as at any time of my life whatever. But I now know that the experience, considered as a state of my own mind, had never had the kind of importance I once gave it. It was valuable only as a pointer to something other and outer. While that other was in doubt, the point naturally loomed large in my thoughts. He who first sees it cries, ‘Look!’ The whole party gathers round and stares. But when we have found the road and are passing signposts every few miles, we shall not stop and stare. They will encourage us and we shall be grateful to the authority that set them up. But we shall not stop and stare, or not much; not on this road, though their pillars are of silver and their lettering of gold. ‘We would be at Jerusalem’ (238).

  • All the things that we attach onto today and think “If I have that, then I’ll be happy”, they are just signposts. So enjoy them, some of them are great! But don’t mistake the sign posts for what they are pointing to which is the city of God and God himself.
  • That gets out out of afraid of enjoying things in this life or resting in them.

How do you really get this joy? 

  • The last part of the passage is worth 5 or 6 sermons. The essence of them is the gospel. There’s a beautiful little summary of the Gospel. “Why we were yet sinners, Christ died for us that we might be saved from God’s wrath.”
  • God’s wrath is not just crankiness. It is his settled judicial opposition to injustice and evil and the human race deserves punishment because we’ve participated in evil and injustice. But, Jesus Christ, while we were still sinners took the wrath, took the condemnation, took the punishment. That’s the gospel. How does that bring joy? 2 ways.
  • a. The gospel shows you the magnitude of your danger.
  • This is counter-intuitive because from the outside you are sinner, lost, punishment, you deserve wrath. This sounds negative. But what this means on the inside? The size of the debt and the magnitude of the danger which we were in before.
  • Imagine you went away and a friend of yours stayed in the home and your friend paid a bill for you while you were gone. How should you respond? It depends on the debt your friend paid for you. What if it was a huge bill for back taxes that you had no resources to pay on your own. You don’t know how grateful to be until you know how bad it was.
  • JC Ryle says one of the reasons you get so upset about your debts, your financial problems, is you don’t realize the great debt of sin, the only debt that could really sink you has been paid. When you see that all other debts seem small.
  • You can’t appreciate the magnitude of the deliverance until you realize the magnitude of your jeopardy.
  • The real disease has been healed.
  • b. the magnitude of Jesus’ pain
  • John 16 where Jesus is trying to comfort his disciples but says a woman giving birth has pain because her time has come but when the baby is born joy for a child is born into the world and so it is with your. Jesus Christ is identifying with the woman.
  • In the ancient world the only way for a woman to give birth to a new baby and the joy of new life was for her to go into a tunnel of anguish, pain and danger. Jesus said “that’s what’s happening to me as I go to the cross.”
  • Here’s how you develop joy. Jesus lost all joy so we could have joy. He experienced anguish so we could have new life. That’s how the love comes. You look at what Jesus has done.
  • Go get it. It’s available.
Posted in Quotations, Sermon Illustrations, Sermon Outline | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Links and Notes for April 3

Rachel Held Evans has long expressed her discomfort and complaint with the American evangelical tradition she grew up in. In this post she explains why she doesn’t fit in the mainline either.

Andrew Sullivan’s Newsweek Piece on Christianity in Crisis

Do Christians divorce at the same rate as the rest of American society? It’s long been asserted that they do. With this study, however, it seems like a lot depends on what other factors are being taken into account.

Andrew Sullivan speaks his mind on Christianity today, and its crisis.

All of which is to say something so obvious it is almost taboo: Christianity itself is in crisis. It seems no accident to me that so many Christians now embrace materialist self-help rather than ascetic self-denial—or that most Catholics, even regular churchgoers, have tuned out the hierarchy in embarrassment or disgust. Given this crisis, it is no surprise that the fastest-growing segment of belief among the young is atheism, which has leapt in popularity in the new millennium. Nor is it a shock that so many have turned away from organized Christianity and toward “spirituality,” co-opting or adapting the practices of meditation or yoga, or wandering as lapsed Catholics in an inquisitive spiritual desert. The thirst for God is still there. How could it not be, when the profoundest human questions—Why does the universe exist rather than nothing? How did humanity come to be on this remote blue speck of a planet? What happens to us after death?—remain as pressing and mysterious as they’ve always been?

That’s why polls show a huge majority of Americans still believing in a Higher Power. But the need for new questioning—of Christian institutions as well as ideas and priorities—is as real as the crisis is deep.

Where to start? Jefferson’s act of cutting out those parts of the Bible that offended his moral and scientific imagination is one approach. But another can be found in the life of a well-to-do son of a fabric trader in 12th-century Italy who went off to fight a war with a neighboring city, saw his friends killed in battle in front of him, lived a year as a prisoner of war, and then experienced a clarifying vision that changed the world. In Francis of Assisi: A New Biography, Augustine Thompson cuts through the legends and apocryphal prayers to describe Saint Francis as he truly lived. Gone are the fashionable stories of an erstwhile hippie, communing with flowers and animals. Instead we have this typical young secular figure who suddenly found peace in service to those he previously shrank from: lepers, whose sores and lesions he tended to and whose company he sought—as much as for himself as for them.
Sullivan is fascinating. Here he tries to merge Jefferson and Francis of Assisi. Whatever you think of Sullivan’s claim he is not alone in his feelings or where he’s sniffing around for answers.

Also check out David Session’s response.

Lots of follow up on Sullivan’s blog. Garry Wills takes on Jefferson’s Jesus (paywall).

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

Eric Metaxas interviews Tim Keller on various topics

A nice interview from Eric Metaxas of Tim Keller. https://vimeo.com/38225632

  • They get into a Tim Keller bio (Minutes 1-18)
  • He gets into science and Genesis and talks about Apostle’s Creed faith
  • He gets into some of his own thoughts on science and the Bible. Gets into the science vs. Bible conflict language. Admits there is a lot he (and we) simply don’t know.
  • Minute 28 Metaxas gets into the topic of hell.  Gets into CS Lewis, The Screwtape Letters and The Great Divorce. Discussed Rob Bell’s book “Love Wins”
  • 39:19: “You don’t have to do doctrinal engineering to get the spirit and tone you want.”
  • Refers to an article by Richard Bauckham on Universalism. The idea that the early church fathers were weak on hell is wrong.
  • Preaching hell minute 42. “Have we backed away wrongly from warning about hell in preaching?” Metaxas.
  • “The curse of God is the curse of free will. CS Lewis says that hell is the greatest monument to free will that there’s ever going to be.” Keller
  • Minute 45: What about the person who lives in a place in the world that never had a chance to hear about Jesus. Keller’s answer is that when we hear the answer to this questions we’re not going to have any problem with that answer. Metaxas: “That’s the most brilliant cop-out I’ve ever heard in my life.”
  • Keller: 1. Christians believe that Jesus Christ is the only way to God. Why? Is that narrow minded? No. If you accept that he’s actually God (every other religion has a founder that says “I’m a prophet, I’m going to show you where God is” Jesus is the only founder of a major religion that says “I’m God come to find you.” What that means is that either Jesus is wrong and he’s inferior to all of the other religions (claim is too outlandish to honor. (pvk)) Vastly inferior, he’s deranged, he’s crazy, a megalomaniac, or he’s superior, and the way to find God. So it’s not just because we decided we’d like to be best. If you believe he’s the resurrected Son of God you have to believe he’s the way in. We’re forced by that. Which means I don’t know of any other way which means that if people haven’t heard or haven’t believed I don’t know of any other way. If when I get to heaven God says “that’s right they’re lost” he’ll tell me why and it will seem fair. If I get to heaven and he tells me “actually there was something else” I’ll be happy there too but I’m not more merciful or more just than God. That’s why I say a.) we have to believe he’s the only way b.) as far as we know you’re lost therefore unless you come to God through Christ and c.) when we find out what the answer is, about how God can be merciful and just at the same time we’ll be completely satisfied.
  • Keller: If you’re doctrine is far enough off, then the God you’re believing in isn’t real. Nevertheless it’s your belief in God and his grace, not perfect doctrinal belief that saves you.
  • Keller: Doesn’t necessarily follow Lewis in this area because Keller finds no information in the Bible that this is true. He was a layman so speculating there is fine.
  • Minute 50. Metaxas when he was at Redeemer was frustrated that Keller wasn’t out there more in the culture. It seems odd that he isn’t on TV more. Keller: one of the worst things is that your church gets flooded with Christians who want to come to hear Keller. Metaxas, why is that a problem? Keller: you are trying to win people to Christ and you’re filled up with Christians. The Christian tourists are not like the people actually in your neighborhood. There’s nothing worse than commuter churches. He’s tried to keep a low profile, but now it’s over. Metaxas pushes back. Keller wants to get out there the people in the church, to be a local pastor, not the voice in the culture.
Posted in Links | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Links and Notes for April 2 2012

Think Christian Reading

A bit of ThinkChristian reading this morning. A review of the Hunger Games.

Also a piece on atheists borrowing from religion. That brought me to the concept of the heat death of the universe.

Also a very interesting piece on facts and narrative taking off on the Mike Daisey scandal over FoxConn and Apple. Wonderfully laid out. Here is my comment.

Oh my, you’ve got us all up into the facts v narrative dilemma that any serious student of the gospel accounts can’t avoid. We run into it with Adam and Eve and genetics, with the flood and modern geology, and then in Holy Week with whether Jesus quotes Psalm 22 (Matt and Mark) or Ps 31 (Luke) or both, etc.

What a lovely illustration with Mike Daisey, you laid it out so beautifully but I can’t help feel that you punted on your conclusion. Are we not too far from the other TC piece I read this AM on Atheists appropriating the technique of religion in order to receive it’s deliverable goods apart from metaphysical assertions of “fact”?

We must get our hands dirty with both facts and narrative yet we are necessarily (and happily so) masters of neither. We are witnesses of, heirs and participants in this world with truths to large for our short little arms.

The experiential payload is in the narrative and but it’s hollow without the concreteness of the fact, as Paul presses in 1 Cor 15.


More Links

Also found, Was Calvin a Calvinist? by Richard Muller.


Posted in Links | Tagged | Leave a comment

Links and Notes from March 30

The Bible and Science

Tim Keller white paper on science and creation from biologos. Also CT news piece on biologos conference in NYC.

Perceptions of Calvinism

Rachel Held Evans got corrected in her quick and dirty lumping of Calvinists with respect to NT Wright.  Through the comments found J Todd Billings and a nice piece clarifying some things between the new Calvinists and those of us who have been in that camp a long time.

For the non-Reformed, TULIP provides a wonderfully convenient box into which Reformed theology can be placed—and criticized. 

TULIP perpetuates a basic misunderstanding about the Reformed tradition: that predestination is the center of Reformed theology from which all else flows. Predestination is indeed important in the Reformed tradition. The Bible speaks about predestination, and the teachings of Calvin and the Synod of Dort seek to use this doctrine in a pastoral way to encourage humility and gratitude to God for salvation. But predestination is one among many teachings that rise and fall on the basis of scriptural exegesis in the Reformed tradition. The New Calvinists have served to further make Calvinism synonymous with a small portion of Reformed teaching.

On Dying

For the sermon doing some work on dying. Tim Stafford’s blog on dying and Grateful to Dead on the history of hospitals.

Risse then notes other popular healing practices of the Middle Ages that were integrated into the monastic medical routine, including herbology, bathing (not otherwise common!), preventive bloodletting, and diagnostic examination of pulse, urine, stool, and blood. Particularly important (and germane to the last thematic chapter of my Medieval Wisdom for Modern Protestants) was that fact that, as Risse tells us, “one of the most important functions of the Benedictine monastery was the preparation for death, involving sick brethren who failed to recover.” Among other things, Risse notes that “periodic visits to the sick by members continued. Some brethren remained with the dying inmate throughout the day and night, praying and reading from the Scriptures by candlelight. The point of this vigil was to ensure ‘proper passing’; nobody should be left to die alone. If death became imminent, the whole monastic community was summoned and the monks congregated around the sick on both sides of the bed alternately to pray and sing, using music to ‘unbind’ the pain and thus provide the departing with spiritual nourishment for the journey to the beyond. Death was usually announced by the clapping of boards or ringing of bells, with burial in the monastic cemetery after elaborate funeral ceremonies. The deceased monk’s name and date of death were inscribed in a memorial book, and he was henceforth included in all intercessionary prayers.” (105)

Also Denial: the American Way of Death.

Modern America appears to be preoccupied with the preservation of youth and beauty, with is catered to by the plastic surgeon. Society seems content to cling to the illusion that youth–and life–can last forever.

However, the millions of dollars people spend to stay young will not delay the inevitable. The fact is that life will end, and how Americans choose to cope with this reality gives us an overall picture of our society’s position on death; generally speaking, the American attitude is one of avoidance.

A major factor contributing to the American view of death is the fact that it has been hidden from us. During the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the dying remained at their homes and their primary caretakers were family members. Children were present along with everyone else throughout the dying process and the subsequent funeral preparations (O’ Connor 1).

Once death occurred, it was the family who handled the funeral arrangements. Family members washed the body, built the coffin, and prepared the grave site (O’ Connor 3). The visitation or wake was held in the home of the deceased.

“Each person learned about death firsthand. From caring for the dying family member through disposition of the corpse, death was within the realm of the family” (DeSpelder and Strickland 12).

How Doctors Choose to Die

American Church History

James Bratt’s excellent The Geography of Faith. 

The crusade against totalitarianism done and won in 1945, Americans instituted a new era by moving outward again, this time to the suburbs. Protestant mainliners tried to follow along with their 1950s low-brand “community church,” but much of their leadership was trying still to give the nation direction, which became a problem in an era of great national turmoil. The divisions of the ‘60s claimed the Protestant mainline as a prime casualty. By the end of the troubles religious custody of the nation had passed to upsurging evangelicals who were eager to say what was right about America again, the rightest thing being that it was still God’s chosen land. The suburbs, and then the exurbs even farther out, proved to be evangelicals’ favored turf, and their genius at exploiting their market was evident in the architecture of their megachurches which replicated that of the center of suburbia, the shopping mall. The megachurch’s huge auditorium served as the anchor store; smaller rooms along radial arms were boutiques for the religious consumer’s special need.

It will take some time before this phase of American re-location is fully passed, but the signs of trouble are well advanced. Suburban poverty is up, way up; its properties high among the foreclosed; its automotive lifeline pinched by $4 going on $5 a gallon gasoline. The Kingdom of Roberts and the Cathedral of Schuller—monuments both to their age—have gone the way of all pride. The megachurch more generally is proving to be a true descendant of the ‘50s community church: low cost of entry breeding far too thin a loyalty and way too easy an exit. The suburbs’ children are opting for cool cities and no cars in place of the geography of nowhere and auto addiction; the creative edge of American life is re-gathering toward the center again. There, house churches, hipster communities, and Tim Keller’s kinder-gentler-and-intellectually-competitive evangelicalism vie with and for the rising tide of the “none’s,” people with no religious preference. The future of American religion belongs to those who can fathom, meet, and anchor these post-seekers on their new native grounds.

Michael Goheen bio. 

Interesting report on how Christian and Jewish traditions view calling Yhwh “Father”

Posted in Links, Quotations | Leave a comment

Links and notes for March 29

Michael Gershon on tolerancehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/catholics-contraceptives-and-john-locke/2012/03/15/gIQAb477ES_story.html

for community values

And the joiners http://www.patrolmag.com/2012/03/22/jonathan-d-fitzgerald/my-generation-is-quitting-church-and-im-considering-membership-or-why-im-not-a-none/http://www.patrolmag.com/2012/03/22/jonathan-d-fitzgerald/my-generation-is-quitting-church-and-im-considering-membership-or-why-im-not-a-none/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Links and Notes for March 28

Interesting NY Times piece about an RC rethinking his tradition. Seems a pretty pro-forma narrative the likes of which circulate today. I should add, however, that if you place it side by side with another RC narrative, like Santorum’s narrative, they seem to run in reverse.

This piece in Forbes on how the right isn’t understanding race relations in the US today.

Posted in Links | Leave a comment

Links and Notes from March 27

Blog piece in Out of Ur by Skye Jethani about how Christian political alignment with the religious right is hurting the church.  Couple of other pieces linked in the article. One from Foriegn Affairs about why mixing religion and politics is bad for both.

Also from Peter Berger’s response.

BOQ: Let me, with all due respect for Campbell and Putnam, suggest a hypothesis of my own:  Most “nones” have not opted out of religion as such, but have opted out of affiliation with organized religion. Among Christians (the great majority of all survey respondents) there are different reasons for this disaffection. The two authors are very probably correct that, broadly speaking, those who are turned off by Evangelicals and conservative Catholics do so because they don’t like the repressive sexual morality of those churches (the sexual abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic Church has not helped). But the “nones” have also exited from mainline Protestantism, which has been much more accommodating to the liberationist ethic. Here, I think, there has been frustration with what my friend and colleague Thomas Luckmann long ago called “secularization from within”—the stripping away of the transcendent dimensions of the Gospel, and its reduction to conventional good deeds, popular psychotherapy and (mostly left-of-center) political agendas. Put differently: My hypothesis implies that some “nones” are put off by churches that preach a repressive morality, some others by churches whose message is mainly secular…

The bulk of the “nones” probably consist of a mix of two categories of unaffiliated believers—in the words of the British sociologist Grace Davie, people who “believe without belonging”. There are those who have put together an idiosyncratic personal creed, putting together bits and pieces of their own tradition with other components. Robert Wuthnow, the most productive and insightful sociologist of American religion, has called this “patchwork religion”. This includes the kind of people who will say “I am Catholic, but…”, followed by a list of items where they differ from the teachings of the church. The other category are the children—by now, grandchildren—of the counter-culture. They will most often say, “I am spiritual, not religious”. The “spirituality” is typically an expression of what Colin Campbell, another British sociologist, has called “Easternization”—an invasion of Western civilization by beliefs and practices from Asia. A few of these are organized, for instance by the various Buddhist schools. But most are diffused in an informal manner—such as belief in reincarnation or the spiritual continuity between humans and nature, and practices like yoga or martial arts. EOQ

The growth of Christianity and the diversity of the Chinese church fascinates me. Tim Stafford has a review of the book “God is Red” at Books and Culture.

Posted in Links, Quotations | Leave a comment