Twitter Updates for 2009-07-09

  • How to resist allowing your bitter adversary make you bitter as well, meditate on the vastness of God's love. blog post http://bit.ly/NSZu8 #
  • RT @jrdkirk: Navigating between the failures of liberal and conservative Christianity: http://cli.gs/MEJTg0 #
  • RT @chuckdegroat: On my blog, the New Exodus journey continues: Security's twisted sister! http://bit.ly/Em9yW #
  • RT @tonystiff: RT @ccef New by David Powlison: I Am Making All Things New http://tr.im/rjXU #
  • Riverside church NYC trashes its 600k pastor for being too evangelical http://bit.ly/T0ZlT #
  • RT @marcholland: I'm not the only one who gained weight during my wife's 1st pregnancy http://tinyurl.com/nscuqa; #
  • Calvin College prof weighs in on Honduran coup http://bit.ly/4SrIV #
  • RT @JohnPiper: "Prick Bunyan and he will bleed Bible." Let it not be said of you: Prick him and he bleeds movies. to this I say: "oh pooh!" #
  • #preachprep PDF from sower sermons of @paulvanderklay: sowers: http://bit.ly/IMWzm and sower interp: http://bit.ly/6JLwS #
  • RT @RachelleGardner: Eavesdrop on three literary agents having lunch! upcoming disruption in publishing? http://bit.ly/ZV4J9 #
  • RT @RachelleGardner: Is publishing about to be disrupted? Read agent Kristin Nelson's thoughts: http://pubrants.blogspot.com/ #
  • Amazing piece on why good companies fail in times of industry transition. ie: newspapers, publishing losing to blogs http://bit.ly/H56Ob #
  • RT @tonystiff: Where is the biblical story heading? "Heaven is not our home," by N.T. Wright http://tinyurl.com/493yhe #
  • RT @CTmagazine: @dneff interviews Mark Noll about his latest book. Does Global Christianity Equal American Christianity? http://tr.im/rrZd #
  • Why I let my tweets clutter up my blog, and why I retweet everything I find helpful, useful or potentially useful http://bit.ly/7U32r #
  • Leslie Newbigin and Kenneth Bailey on Jesus, justice and reconciliation http://bit.ly/3e46VR #
  • Mark Sanford, Michael Jackson, Steve McNair as illustrating Jesus' 3 warnings in Luke 11 and 12 http://bit.ly/OxLoA #
  • John Calvin as guest voice at the Washington Post "On Faith" http://bit.ly/RCmK3 #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-07-09

Three Warnings, Three Men, Three illustrations

In Luke 11 and 12 Jesus gives three warnings.

  • In 11:37-54 he warns the Pharisees and the Teachers of the Law. They are banking on external compliance to impress God and their supposed audience of the efficacy of their religious program to save their land.
  • In 12:1-12 Jesus (in Luke) meets new found popularity (perhaps by insulting the religious group in the previous passage) and so warns his disciples against “the yeast of the Pharisees”. This time playing to the crowd in order to gain what the crowd has to offer. They are to guide their course before an audience of one and it will mean that they are in fact unpopular and it will be life threatening. He notes, however, that from an age-of-decay/age-to-come perspective following the crowd in fact sends you to the place where we regularly sacrifice our children (Gehenna).
  • In 12:13-21 we find one who didn’t play religious games, didn’t play to the crowd, in fact all he cared about was himself and his possessions until even his own self was taken away from him.

In the news recently we’ve had three men who might embody each story

Posted in Sermon Illustrations | Comments Off on Three Warnings, Three Men, Three illustrations

Newbigin and Bailey on Jesus, Justice and Reconciliation

In his book Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes Kenneth Bailey works through the parable of the barn builder (Luke 12). He notes that right from the beginning Jesus balks at the appeal for justice made by the younger brother against the elder brother. The younger brother appeals not for reconciliation over the dispute involving his father’s estate, but rather for his brother to divide the estate and pay out. It is a righteous appeal, but Jesus balks. Justice by our own hands is seldom done. Bailey quotes from Leslie Newbigin.

If we acknowledge the God of the Bible, we are committed to a struggle for justice in society. Justice means giving to each his due. Our problem, as seen in the light of the gospel, is that each of us overestimates what is due him compared with what is due to his neighbor. If I do not acknowledge a justice which judges the justice for which I fight, I am an agent, not of justice, but of lawless tyranny. Leslie Newbigin The Open Secret p. 124


Posted in Quotations, Understanding the Bible | Tagged | Comments Off on Newbigin and Bailey on Jesus, Justice and Reconciliation

Why do I let me tweets clutter up my blog?

I find twitter and the little utility that imports them daily into my blog enormously useful. When via Twitter I find pieces I like or could find useful later on I simply have to re-tweet them and they are saved with their short description and link. I then via the search function of the blog have my own micro-Google where I can much more easily locate things than I could through regular search engines for use in sermons or other written material. It is an enormously effortless library system that I find useful but also that anyone else can use. Instead of asking me if I have something on a subject, just come to my blog and search for it. It’s all right here.

Posted in Blog note | Comments Off on Why do I let me tweets clutter up my blog?

The End of Wrath

PDF Version of this post

I spent a lot of my day yesterday trying to understand what the Bible talks about when it talks about God’s wrath.

Most of the “spiritual” people I meet tend to say almost nothing about God’s wrath. I get the impression that they imagine God’s wrath is something that ought to be put in a box somewhere like those ghastly pictures from Junior High.

Wrath is different from anger and different from punishment. They are often connected, but they are distinct. God’s wrath is not something essential to his being, and it is not eternal. God’s wrath is contextual, it is dependent upon a set of circumstances and a series of relationships.

Have you ever been in a situation where there was so much conflict you could almost feel the tension in the room? Have you told someone that this hostility or tension was so real, so thick you could feel it and almost see it? It was a thing dependent upon people, but it was also a sort of a thing in and of itself by virtue of the context and the relationships there. God’s wrath is something like that. Anger is an emotion, wrath is often connected to anger but it is a different thing and sometimes, in a way, a thing in itself in a way anger is not.

The roots of the Greek word that we translate in the New Testament as wrath involves “lavish swelling of sap and vigour, a thrusting or upsurging”. Wrath is a manifestation of a relationship. The ancients usually distinguished between divine wrath and human wrath. Human wrath was more easily known. Someone’s wrath is often manifest when they lose their temper and subsequently act rashly. That is easily embodied in stories. In the Star Wars stories the slaughter of the sand people (and later the young Jedis in training) by Anakin Skywalker is an expression of his wrath. The wrath of a violent hero or villain is often an element of popular movies and stories. The wrath of the ruthless and powerful evokes strong emotions, fear, anger, resentment, envy, etc.

These illustrations of wrath might lead you to imagine wrath is always a negative thing. If you think about positive goods that need to be protected or brought into a context of loss or destruction we think positively of wrath. When we are the victims of injustice or violence our minds naturally seek a rescuer who will overthrow the oppressor and release ourselves, or the oppressed from some tyranny. There are many stories that envision this as well. Prisoners who are being unjustly imprisoned cry out for a strong deliverer who can overcome their adversary. Such a victim fantasizes about the power and the righteousness of their hero who loves them and who will not stop until they are free. You might think of Princess Buttercup (“The Princess Bride”) who awaits her rescue from Wesley. She boldly states to Humperdink that her lover is strong and true and will stop at nothing to rescue his beloved from Humperdink’s evil clutches.

Ideas of wrath are often connected with someone’s jealousy for what is rightfully theirs. We often confuse the jealousy, covetousness and envy. To covet is to want what another rightfully possesses. To envy is to hate the other for what they rightfully possess. To be jealous is to guard that which you rightfully possess from those who wish to wrongfully take it from you. Jealousy and wrath go hand in hand.

When we hear in the Hebrew Scriptures that “I the LORD your God am a jealous God” and when we hear about his wrath we bristle. “That doesn’t sound very nice.” It isn’t nice and it shouldn’t be nice. What God is saying is that he is passionate about things that really matter. He is in fact passionate about things that matter very much to you and to me. When the strong take the weak, when the powerful abuse those who have no defense, when villages are overrun and crops are stolen and women and children are made slaves for the beds, kitchens and fields of the powerful God is jealous, his anger is stoked and his wrath is sure to come. This isn’t alien to any of us. If we watch a movie and we see these kinds of things we feel the same way, too often, however, we realize that we are often unable to right the wrong that has been done and punish those who act in this way. Often when we try we do it unjustly and simply initiate a cycle of retribution.

This we understand, but a reader of the Hebrew Scriptures might ask “why is God’s wrath so large and so powerful?” That’s a good question and the easy answer is that God is so large and so powerful so that his wrath is proportionate to himself. There’s even more to that though. God is not only larger than we are in power, he is also purer than we are in goodness. Human wrath, as we know, is often tragic in consequence because we act rashly usually without judgment concerning justice and outcomes. Human wrath is also limited to what is within our sphere of control. Divine wrath is different by orders of magnitude.

Is God’s wrath eternal? It would seem not.

Blessedness, goodness, purity and joy are in fact eternal. Rebellion, corruption, loss and anguish can never be eternal, the most they can be are everlasting. “Eternal” is a line with arrows on both ends (no beginning, no end), “everlasting” always has a starting point and a vector only going in one direction (a beginning but no end). God and his goodness have no beginning and no end. Grace is foundational, punishment is the abnormality and the exception. Grace is always before, is always older, is always primary.

God’s wrath is not a part of his being, it is a dynamic that results from his goodness, purity and power occasioned by rebellion. Punishment may be everlasting, but wrath is not. God’s holiness plus presence plus rebellion yields his wrath.

The book of Revelation is filled with references to God’s wrath. I understand the series of trumpets in the book of Revelation to not be warning trumpets, like civil defense sirens, but rather war trumpets, as in the siege of Jericho or Gideon’s army. The trumpets are shock and awe intended to strike the hearts of God’s adversaries with fear. The wrath of God is the presence of God coming to save his people and coming into direct confrontation with all that is in rebellion against him.

The results of God’s wrath, or the instruments of God’s wrath are not always godly or godlike. In the Old Testament the “hand” of God’s wrath is sometimes evil enemy armies or natural calamities. In Revelation sometimes its demonic hoards released from the pit in which they were imprisoned envisioned as locusts or armies. Sometimes its disorder and sin reeking havoc in our lives. God’s wrath results from a swelling of his presence resulting in the intensification of rebellion and opposition.

All of this makes the seventh trumpet in Revelation 11 glorious. Bad things escalated dramatically with each of the six preceding trumpets, but with the seventh something glorious happens. The heavenly chorus (angels, elders, creatures, saints) announce the fulfilment of Jesus’ request in the Lord’s prayer that God’s will be done on earth as it is in heaven. The twenty four elders then break into worship with a complex poem:

We give you thanks, Lord God Almighty, who are and who were
FOR you have taken your great power
AND begun to reign (indicative)
AND the nations raged (indicative)
AND your wrath has come (indicative)
AND the time to judge (infinitive) the dead
AND to give (infinitive) the reward to your servants the prophets
AND the saints
AND those who fear your name, the small and the great
AND to destroy (indicative) the destroyers of the earth
AND was opened (indicative) the temple of God in the heaven
AND was seen (indicative) the ark of the covenant in his temple
AND there was (indicative) flashes of lightning, rumblings, peals of thunder, an earthquake and heavy hail

The wrath has come because this is God showing up in his absolute fullness and bringing an end to the rebellion. After the judgment it will be the end of his wrath.

In the end there are two groups, those who want God and those who don’t. If hell is the place where God anomalously and utterly excludes his presence then God is all-in-all everywhere else.  Heaven and earth are one and all that remains is in tune with himself but yet separate (see the post on freedom). God is then finished with wrath because all rebellion is isolated away from his presence along with everything and everyone that persists in opposing his presence.

Our issues with God’s wrath are our own and they are our emotional reactions to his sovereignty. Deep within us all is an impulse that objects and resists God himself and in a Freudian way wishes to replace him. His presence therefore always has this dual nature for us. We are both attracted and repulsed by his power and his beauty, wanting it to be our own, hating it because it is not.

When we read the book of Revelation we read it in the context of our intense splitness. We pray against ourselves. We pray for that the part of us drawn to God, that wishes to submit to him and to enjoy him completely as we were made to do, with all our limitations and smallness. We pray against that part that wishes to be what we were not made to be and could never be, God himself. Somewhere in the dynamic the mystery of his image in us is revealed. We were made to be like him, he put some of himself in us and this can only be found by embracing the submitting creature that can be perfectly joyful.

When we pray for God’s presence we ask for his wrath and we seek the day when that wrath will be no more because the rebellion that elicits it will also be no more, both inside ourselves and in the creation.

Posted in theological, Understanding the Bible | Tagged | Comments Off on The End of Wrath

Resisting the transfer of bitterness

I’ve noticed that third-personification of one’s grievances is a critical feature of the anatomy of bitterness. When a person has chosen to take residence in near perpetual anger and bitterness the task of seeking validation and vindication for this bitterness is constant. There is no end to seeking illustration and argumentation to justify this cruel state. Even if the person has jettisoned belief in God all together, they simply can’t help but continue to appeal to some imagined court (or to anyone who cares to listen) to press their claim against their adversary. When you are that adversary it is very difficult indeed to not enter into this dynamic. The subpoenas keep mounting and you too wish to enter into that courtroom to justify yourself and be vindicated from the charges that are continually brought against you. Over time this can easily lead to a transfer of the bitterness, tempting you to also take up residence in that cruel bondage.

This morning I was listening to the hymn “The Love of God”. One stanza says this:

Could we with ink the ocean fill,
And were the skies of parchment made,
Were every stalk on earth a quill,
And every man a scribe by trade,
To write the love of God above,
Would drain the ocean dry.
Nor could the scroll contain the whole,
Though stretched from sky to sky.

I found it very helpful to imagine that love applying to the one who has chosen to make me their adversary. To imagine that their bitterness does not poison God’s love, and compared to that love their paltry attempt at resistance cannot endure. I’ve been to the ocean. I know its power. I know its depth. I know its endurance. We are nothing before it. What this does is soften my heart against the one who has chosen to present their case against me and take hope from the power of God to endure the kind of bitterness and animosity brought against God’s son on that day when they mocked him on the cross. If God’s love has resources like this, then I can decide to resist bitterness again today and appeal to him to share this vast sea of love with me so that I too may live in his joy and not lodge in the cruel house of bitterness.

Posted in Devotional Reflection, Quotations | Comments Off on Resisting the transfer of bitterness

Twitter Updates for 2009-07-08

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-07-08

Of God and Tyrants

This is a repost from January 2005

All tyrants want to be in some respect like God. They want to be all knowing, so they establish secret police and spy on people. They want to be all powerful, to control people, and they want to be everywhere, so they put up statues of themselves all over the place like Saddam or Turkenbashi. Tyrants really want to destroy diversity. In Iraq men all wore mustaches like Saddam. Tyrants want everyone to think alike, talk alike, hold to the party line.

God, however, has all these things, but does not act like a tyrant. Just look around. If God wanted to be a tyrant the world would look very different, and in fact some of us would welcome some of the changes.

Tyrants want to be like God in everything except character. God has want tyrants want except his character. Our fall was a grasping after tyranny. Our walk of redemption is a seeking after his character.

CS Lewis has a great piece from the Screwtape letters: (remember you have to read it as one demon writing another)

To us a human is primarily food; our aim is the absorption of its will into ours, the increase of our own area of selfhood at its expense. But the obedience which the Enemy demands of men is quite a different thing. One must face the fact that all the talk about His love for men, and His service being perfect freedom, is not (as one would gladly believe) mere propaganda, but an appalling truth. He really does want to fill the universe with a lot of loathsome little replicas of Himself –creatures whose life, on its miniature scale, will be qualitatively like His own, not because he has absorbed them but because their wills freely conform to His. We want cattle who can finally become food; He wants servants who can finally become sons. We want to suck in, He wants to give out. We are empty and would be filled; He is full and flows over. Our war aim is a world in which Our Father Below has drawn all other beings into himself; the Enemy wants a world full of beings united to Him, but still distinct.

Screwtape letters, pg. 46

Posted in Tech tools, theological | Tagged | Comments Off on Of God and Tyrants

Twitter Updates for 2009-07-07

  • RT @tonystiff: Check out the beta version of the new Redeemer Church Planting Center website here: http://tinyurl.com/magwex #
  • RT @djchuang: CT piece: is the "answer" to the fall of "celebrity evangelicals" "we all need to just try harder!!!" ? http://is.gd/1lCZO #
  • Looking for Sarah Palin amidst her muddled message, best decrypting I've seen so far http://bit.ly/FNnG6 #
  • RT @chuckdegroat: Egypt as Edom and a womb too small http://bit.ly/uTOye #
  • RT @tonystiff: paper on Leslie Newbigin's contribution to missiology, "Gospel, Culture, and Cultures" http://tinyurl.com/ontbpe #
  • RT @lscrc: In Revelation 11 two witnesses appear destroying their enemies with fire. What can this mean? http://bit.ly/BCweR #
  • RT @lscrc: In Luke 12 Jesus sharply warns his disciples not to chase popularity. mp3 sermon download http://bit.ly/qAT6v #
  • Time mag: "Few things hamper a child as much as not having a father at home" http://bit.ly/bM5HE #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-07-07

Twitter Updates for 2009-07-04

  • False choices on the atonement http://bit.ly/2S9hDO #
  • Atonement metaphors often arise out of missional motivations, the Bible contains different metaphors, not a problem http://bit.ly/7lGDO #
  • Tim Keller's Leadership Article: "The Gospel in all its Forms" http://bit.ly/1aD4Dr #
  • "Spiritual but not religious?" On groups that say they are naked but everyone else can see their cultural clothes. http://bit.ly/aWvuU #

Powered by Twitter Tools.

Posted in Tweets | Comments Off on Twitter Updates for 2009-07-04