Turn the tassel: Prison inmates are closing in on Calvin College degrees | WZZM13.com

http://www.wzzm13.com/features/turn-the-tassel-prison-inmates-are-closing-in-on-calvin-college-degrees/406849934

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Poll: Does Trump’s support have a ceiling — or a floor? – CBS News

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/nation-tracker-poll-does-trump-support-have-a-ceiling-or-a-floor/

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Evangelicalism & The Ben Op, Part IV | The American Conservative

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/evangelicalism-the-ben-op-part-iv/

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Good Example of Our Two-Movie Reality | Scott Adams’ Blog

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/157149611381/good-example-of-our-two-movie-reality

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Andrew Sullivan on the Madness of King Donald

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/andrew-sullivan-the-madness-of-king-donald.html

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

The Disease of More

https://markmanson.net/disease-of-more

and from Brave New World

“A New Theory of Biology,” was the title of the paper which Mustapha Mond had just finished reading. He sat for some time, meditatively frowning, then picked up his pen and wrote across the title-page: “The author’s mathematical treatment of the conception of purpose is novel and highly ingenious, but heretical and, so far as the present social order is concerned, dangerous and potentially subversive. Not to be published.” He underlined the words. “The author will be kept under supervision. His transference to the Marine Biological Station of St. Helena may become necessary.” A pity, he thought, as he signed his name. It was a masterly piece of work. But once you began admitting explanations in terms of purpose—well, you didn’t know what the result might be. It was the sort of idea that might easily decondition the more unsettled minds among the higher castes—make them lose their faith in happiness as the Sovereign Good and take to believing, instead, that the goal was somewhere beyond, somewhere outside the present human sphere; that the purpose of life was not the maintenance of well-being, but some intensification and refining of consciousness, some enlargement of knowledge. Which was, the Controller reflected, quite possibly true. But not, in the present circumstance, admissible. He picked up his pen again, and under the words “Not to be published” drew a second line, thicker and blacker than the first; then sighed, “What fun it would be,” he thought, “if one didn’t have to think about happiness!”

Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World (Kindle Locations 2124-2135). HarperCollins. Kindle Edition.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Peter Damian

http://www.awrsipe.com/Docs_and_Controversy/2004-12-01-magisterium.htm

Born in 1007 in Ravenna, Peter Damian experienced evil early in life. According to his medieval biography, Peter Damian’s mother had willfully withheld food from him so that he would die and relieve the family of the burden of having another child to care for and feed. This was not an uncommon way of handling unwanted children, especially in times of famine. However, it was the mistress of a local priest who intervened and saved his life. As a child, he lost both parents and spent some time being raised by his siblings. His medieval biographer claims that he spent some of his childhood with an abusive older brother, but Peter Damian never confirms this in his own writings. Peter Damian did, however, reminisce warmly about a period of time that he spent under the care of one of his older sisters. (11) Finally, his brother Damian, the archpriest of Ravenna, took him under his care and saw to it that he was properly cared for and educated.

Peter Damian was an excellent student and eventually became a master rhetorician at schools in Parma and Ravenna. To appreciate his work, it is important to keep in mind that he was trained as a rhetorician using language and categories that would have appealed to eleventh-century sensibilities. As Jean Leclercq noted, his was an age that loved powerful language. (12) Though his language was strong, his goal was to call people to penance and to reform their behavior. While it is true that he wrote some sophisticated theology on issues such as divine omnipotence, it would be a mistake to read him as a philosopher.

Perhaps as a result of his early experiences of evil, Peter Damian was increasingly scandalized by the behavior of the students and professors at the diocesan cathedral schools. Town and gown fights, sexual immorality, simony, and clergymen jockeying for higher positions were just some of the behaviors that scandalized him. In 1035, at the age of 28, Peter Damian walked away from his promising career and joined a strict monastic community at Fonte Avellana. Once he was in the safe, if austere, environment of the monastery, he set about the task of reforming the Church through a series of widely distributed letters, treatises, and sermons.

Because of his growing fame as a preacher and a reformer, Peter Damian was plucked out of the monastery and appointed the cardinal bishop of Ostia in 1057. The reform issues facing the Church as an institution during his lifetime were simony, clerical concubinage, and the sexual immorality of monks and clergy. Simony, the buying and selling of sacred things, was a pervasive sin. He defended the moderate position that simoniacal and sexually active clerics could validly perform the sacraments for others–though their sacramental acts simply served to condemn them as vessels fit for destruction. (13) His most lasting institutional reform involved the process of electing the pope. Peter Damian and several of his fellow reformers established the system whereby the cardinals elected the pope in order to free papal elections from the direct control by the Roman nobility, the emperors, and other political powers. (14)

After several years in the vanguard of the reforming party of the Roman Curia, Peter Damian asked to be relieved of his duties so that he could return to the eremitical life of his monastic order. Still he never abandoned the cause of reform. He was a man deeply committed to the quiet life of contemplation even as he played a large role in international affairs involving both the Church and the state until his death in 1072. As a monk, he was a strong advocate of “the discipline” or self-flagellation but his sermons reveal a playfulness and delightfulness that seem inconsistent with his harsh ascetical practices and strident reform rhetoric.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Was Obama your enemy? Is Trump? Jesus says “love our enemy”. Dare you?

When Consumerism Meets the Totalitarian Culture War

Does your brand of phone or clothing or hotel express whether you are part of the blue tribe or red tribe?

Why would Air BNB spend probably 5 million dollars on their superbowl ad which, unless you know their logo, mentioned not their name? Why would they then promise to give 4 million dollars to a refugee cause? Why not simply give 9 million dollars to the cause?

Who was it that said

Matthew 6:1–4 (NIV)

1 “Be careful not to practice your righteousness in front of others to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. 2 “So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by others. Truly I tell you, they have received their reward in full. 3 But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, 4 so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you.

Air BNB knows exactly what they are doing. Nordstroms knows what they are doing. Expect other corporations to act in a similar way. Uber backed down from their pro-Trump posture because it threatened their bottom line.

The subtle irony beneath the Air BNB add is that “we accept” can also mean “we accept Visa and MasterCard” because you won’t be accepted by Air BnB if you don’t have the money to pay.

Natural Born Tribalists

Psychologists will tell you that your brain is set up to be naturally tribal. Before you have a moment to think your brain has already told you whether or not you like a person or a brand or a situation based on your conditioning. The baby in the womb is already conditioned to respond positively to her mother and father’s voice. If the mother has a favorite song that she sings the baby will also connect that song with safety, security and well-being.

The opposite is true of course. If someone hurts you as a child your brain is programmed to respond, often in unhelpful ways to things associated with that trauma and your unhelpful responses to that trauma will probably follow you all the days of your life and have the potential of shipwrecking your ability to form healthy, stable and productive relationships. Therapists know this of course and seek to cure it but no one knows better than they do of the vast gulf between seeing this in someone and helping them overcome it.

Many of us know this intellectually but when it comes down to the decisions that we feel are most right in our gut we imagine that we are the exception to this dynamic. Scott Alexander, an atheist, secular Jewish psychologist who would never vote for Trump and lives in a blue-tribe university town blogged about the relationship between the outgroup in our new tribal society.

Most of us conditioned by the blue tribe immediately jump to racism as an expression of our natural tribalism. We imagine that being a part of the blue tribe, acknowledging how deeply ingrained racism is somehow adequately equips us to not fall prey to its habits.

Again, on the surface this seems reasonable but again I ask you to consult a therapist and ask them that even if their patient comes to the point of admitting that they are a victim of childhood trauma does that admission alone resolve the learned responses that are devastating their current relationships? They would be better to take a AA first step approach and admit they are powerless over their reactions and seek a higher power to save them from their own personal brand of relational suicide.

Alexander analyzes the situation.

One of the best-known examples of racism is the “Guess Who’s Coming To Dinner” scenario where parents are scandalized about their child marrying someone of a different race. Pew has done some good work on this and found that only 23% of conservatives and 1% (!) of liberals admit they would be upset in this situation. But Pew also asked how parents would feel about their child marrying someone of a different political party. Now 30% of conservatives and 23% of liberals would get upset. Average them out, and you go from 12% upsetness rate for race to 27% upsetness rate for party – more than double. Yeah, people do lie to pollsters, but a picture is starting to come together here.

Since people will delight in misinterpreting me here, let me overemphasize what I am not saying. I’m not saying people of either party have it “worse” than black people, or that partyism is more of a problem than racism, or any of a number of stupid things along those lines which I am sure I will nevertheless be accused of believing. Racism is worse than partyism because the two parties are at least kind of balanced in numbers and in resources, whereas the brunt of an entire country’s racism falls on a few underprivileged people. I am saying that the underlying attitudes that produce partyism are stronger than the underlying attitudes that produce racism, with no necessary implications on their social effects.

But if we want to look at people’s psychology and motivations, partyism and the particular variant of tribalism that it represents are going to be fertile ground.

World Killers Continue reading →

Posted in On the way to Sunday's sermon | Tagged , | Leave a comment

The Politicized Consumer

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Why Was Betsy DeVos the One Nominee Who Provoked Opposition?

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/why-was-betsy-devos-the-one-nominee-who-provoked-opposition.html

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment