Sidewalk Chalk at Synod2016

Posted in CRC | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Difference Between a Hermeneutical Study and a Confessional Conversation

Hermeneutics

As the debate over same-sex marriage and LGBTQ inclusion in the church rages a strange word you will often hear is “hermeneutics”. It surfaced yesterday in the RCA Synod.

rca scripture

You can see in the struck-out text “hermeneutical methods” replaced by “a Reformed Understanding”

Why does this word come up? 

It comes up because one group says “the Bible says same sex relationships and sexual acts are immoral and God is against them. It says so right here in the Bible which is the Word of God.”

Another group says “these are God’s beloved children just as they are, fearfully and wonderfully made by Him!” (see RCA Synod floor debate about 1:15)

So in a “Bible believing” church the groups go to the Bible to battle it out. Each group will turn to the other and say “you’re not reading it right!”

Well, since this kind of thing has happened for centuries rules were developed for how to read it and how to interpret it. These rules are called “hermeneutics”. The idea is that if you can get the rules right then you will have certainty that you are reading right and that you are hearing God right and that you and God are on the same page and your rivals, friendly or otherwise are wrong.

Fashionable Skepticism Frustrating Politics Continue reading →

Posted in CRC | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Ranking Churches and Religions on “Acceptance of Homosexuality”

RNS

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

The #RCASynod votes for the night to change their church order on one man, one woman

Livestream starts around minute 25

rca classis power new motion affirm

This was supposed to be a pro-forma “reaffirmation” that classes are the major authority.

rca defeats reaffirmation

Minute 41:05

Then it sounded like last year General Synod sent to the Commission on Church order a task to include in the church order that churches and pastors shall not perform weddings other than between a man and a woman. The Commission sent something back that said that church councils have the final say in what happens. This didn’t make Synod happy so they did another substitute motion essentially to what they wanted the Commission on Church Order to do.

rca substitute motion for bco

Tonight it would go to a “committee of reference” and then come back to the floor tomorrow to be ratified by this General Synod again.

Now again, I’m CRC and our rules are different. I know denominational rules and procedures are unique to their own systems so I don’t pretend to understand this but that was what I gathered from watching the video. The motion was passed.

A couple of pastors stood up and declared that if this passed they would violate it and happily be brought up on charges. (about 1:12 and 1:15)

rca bco addition vote

So, that’s the best I could figure out. We’ll see what they do tomorrow. pvk

RCA Press Release

Posted in CRC | Tagged | Leave a comment

James KA Smith on Q_Ideas living in a Secular Age

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

How #RCASynod is backing into a Confessional Conversation on the floor of its General Synod.

rca two denominations

Watching the RCA Livestream

Watch the Saved Livestream here

This afternoon the RCA Synod voted to send its “one man and one woman” liturgy to the classes for ratification. To me that’s not the big news.

Then the topic came up of having an “affinity classis” for LGBTQ inclusion.

The RCA General Synod rules (unlike the CRC rules) has a strange, and in my opinion counterproductive practice of allowing “substitute motions” to be inserted into the discussion. A substitute motion looking for a “grace-filled and orderly separation” into two denominations.

I almost fell off my chair! You can just propose this from the floor of Synod?!

Anyway. It failed.

Then this came next.

rca hermeneutics

Daniel Meeter, who I respect immensely,  noted that he asked for this and nobody wanted it. Then Rene House (spelling?) moved an amendment.

rca scripture

And she says “and we will get nowhere on any discussions that are complex unless we do this work together.”

From there the discussion divides into three camps,  all of them right.

  • “We already HAVE this in our ‘standards’ (RCA language for confessions), creeds and confessions.”
  • “I would LOVE to sit down and talk about this… What is scripture, how do we read it…” There was a one point where someone was remarking about the neo-orthodox distinction “the Bible CONTAINS the Word of God” and “the Bible IS the Word of God, and another woman “Jesus is the Word of God…” Apartheid came up.
  • “We need to figure out what it means to be Reformed” and then “We already know what it means to be Reformed, the Reformers have been talking about these issues…”

I was nearly jumping up and down in my chair. We are making progress!

What both the CRC and the RCA Need

  • We should understand what we both believe on paper but have forgotten in practice. Confessions administer the unity of the church. This is why signing them is the gate for inclusions into the leadership of the church. We already HAVE the system. We must use it.
  • We do not need a hermeneutic conversation, where we try to figure out what individual passages say, we need a confessional conversation where we look at the bigger context. We will not resolve this by trying to agree on what Leviticus says, we must first work on and find agreement, or disagreement, on what Leviticus IS. 
  • The process of having this confessional conversation cannot be delegated to experts. It cannot be a top-down process because the goal if it now is for local clergy and lay leaders to re-understand confessions and the reason for them. As I’ve said many times there may be many proto-confessions that could arise from this. Maybe there might be separation and re-organization of denominations. Maybe there will be new structures of unity. The point is that we need to do this work together, and apart. We need to have words and terms mean something that both sides can understand, and then agree or disagree or find ways to work with disagreement.
  • This is bigger than one denomination. The RCA would be an ideal conversational partner with us.
  • The political process is distinct. Again, I’ve written a lot about this in the last month.  Again, although the current context is LGBTQ inclusion, the issues are far larger and broader and if we don’t have the conversation now we’ll have it 10 years from now over another issue just like we didn’t have it 30 years ago over WICO.
Posted in CRC | Tagged , | 2 Comments

How the Pulse Tragedy Tempts the CRC to forget their Confessional Scripts and Mimic the Competing Civil Religions of our Day

Northside Chapel

Confessions in the Papers

Over the next few weeks we will read a lot of statement like this piece in the Orlando Sentinel.  The piece is an appeal for the church to love like Jesus did and love as Jesus commanded. I completely agree with this appeal. We should love like Jesus but we should also believe what Jesus believed and trust in what Jesus trusted in.

The piece also says some other things that I think Reformed Christians should pause over and nuance. This sentence in particular stood out at me.

And pastors, stand up in your pulpit and declare from the depths of your soul that nothing like this can ever happen again.

And this is exactly what I mean by the CRC needing to have a confessional conversation.

When you hear a sentence like this  you’re speaking eschatology. You are appealing to a theology of “where we are heading”.

I understand what the writer wants to say. He’s trying to say “should never happen again” but he’s trying to strengthen “should” by relocating this within our control. This is also a soteriological move, a move in theological terms that talks about “how we are saved” and “what we are saved from”.

Right now social media and mainstream media and our elected officials will be promoting numerous salvation strategies to insure “this can never happen again”.

  • Gun control
  • More citizens with guns to stop attackers
  • ban on Muslim immigration and tracking Muslim residents and citizens
  • better counter-terrorism surveillance
  • LGBTQ acceptance
  • better mental health system
  • add your own

While we should make improvements in public policy to make things safer, no one seriously imagines there will not be more shootings, more terrorist attacks, more hate crimes, more incidences of violence from people suffering from mental illness, etc. We are awash in violence for a world of reasons. Just look at Boko Haram attacks.

We should also note that we have no agreement on what or how to do it. What we will do over the next few weeks is having the political factions take up their positions and causes and fight over these things. There are contradictory things on that list and it is likely that none of them will be achieved any time soon. Many Christians will disagree about the list too.

Trying to Wield God To Recreate the World

We are trying to gain control of something we fear by draping it in religious language. This becomes a way of employing God or spirituality to achieve our will.

I preached about taking the ark out to beat up the Philistines 2 weeks ago. You may know what happened. The ark was capture, Israel lost the war, but something strange happened along the way, the ark could not be turned into a weapon for our wars. The Philistines who wanted to keep the ark as a trophy of their victory of Yhwh and Israel found they could not contain it. When Israel received the ark back they poked around with it and too found it too hot to handle. They eventually sent it away for safekeeping for twenty years while they sank in frustrated ambivalence about this God they could not control.

Beneath our public statements the church is communicating some subtle things to our neighbors. We really do believe that we have the power to banish sin with our laws, our tools of public influence, our military and police powers. I believe this is a betrayal of our Christian confession. We have no such power.

Maybe you don’t believe me. Maybe you think that if we get the right laws in place, get the right people in charge, make people believe the right things, banish all bigotry, hatred, and racism from our hearts, convince everyone in the world that love and acceptance is the right way, etc. etc. THEN everything will be great.

I would suggest to you that if you believe this then you have a religion and it isn’t really Christianity or any other “organized” religion. You have one of our competing civil religions. It has no name because many people believe it is “just the way it is”. We might call it progressive liberationism, or secular humanism or John Lennonism.

Revisiting Israel, Eden, Noah and Babel

Over the last few hundred years many churches have subtly moved from a posture of hope and trust in God to a posture of optimism combined with legalism. We have revisited project Israel.

Israel was given the law at Sinai and told that if she obeyed it then her crops would grow, her animals would produce, her armies would win and life would be great, for Israel. The story of Israel in the Old Testament is the testing of that project. It was a failure. Why? Because it covers up our fundamental problem. We imagine that if we know the right thing to do we will do it. This is a lie we tell ourselves to make ourselves feel better about what we are and what we can do. Israel’s story should show us that this doesn’t work.

We look back and say “but Israel had bad laws. We know more now and with new and better laws, and with social sciences and good police work and drugs and politics to help us we can really accomplish this.”

Pardon me if I’m skeptical. This is also the sin of Babel.

We imagine we will build a city with a tower up to God and finally do what Israel and the Sinai law were unable. We can’t achieve political agreement sufficient to address climate change, banish wars, make economics sufficiently equitable that major portions of the world don’t life in crushing poverty, yet we seriously imagine we’re going to banish bigotry, hatred and bias with laws, education and social stigma and pressure?

Along the way we revisit the sin of the Garden of Eden. The man and the woman want to define what is good and how the world should be. They’re not up to it. 75 years ago we thought we knew what was good. We’ve changed our minds on lots of matters since then. We stand up and say “yes our grandparents are wrong but NOW we KNOW for sure!” Don’t you think 75 years from now they’ll feel about us what we feel about our grandparents?

Along the way we revisit the strategy of the flood. We think the problem with the world are the bad people. We will first try to re-educate the bad people and if they prove to be incorrigible we will exile them to prison or a penal colony on the moon and THEN the world will be safe and loving and beautiful… God picked Noah and his family, the best man in the world, but in the end it solved nothing. The line between good and evil runs through every human heart.

Christians Have a Confession that differs from the ascending civil religion

I believe Reformed Christians have a different confession, a different way to approach the world. While the tragedy of Pulse may not be exactly repeated there will be lots of other tragedies, wars, shootings, etc. etc. and we have no power to stop it because we have no power to stop us. In the drama of a tragedy the church too often forgets who and what it is and takes up the confessions of the civil religion of its day.

In the US we did it during the cold war from the right. Now we’re doing it again from the left. Draping Christian language on the civil religion sentiments, anthropologies, eschatologies, and soteriologies hurts the church and blunts its witness. Pastors are trained in the narrative of the church. Why do we forget it when there is a crisis?

The Christian Reformed Church is struggling to figure out its witness, its place in our world. We are tempted to hear and parrot popular religious sentiments, especially civil religious sentiments from both sides when tragedies like this occur that inflame political and social conflicts. A better witness is to remember our beliefs as expressed in our confessions and figure out how to speak to our world from these perspectives.

 

Posted in CRC | Tagged , | 2 Comments

Pulse Orlando Shootings Omar Mateen

But that, of course, is just the point. If the issue here is religiously motivated homophobia, then that’s a problem that is far from unique to Islam. It suggests the problem is not whether you read the Koran or the Bible, but whether or not you use religion as an excuse to wallow in bigotry. Which, in turn, implicates the Republican party that has spent decades stoking and exploiting Christian homophobia. You can pretend that Islam is a unique problem if the issue is violence done in the name of ISIS and their apocalyptic fantasies. Islam simply isn’t the only religion that teaches anti-gay views. There’s not a lot of wiggle room here.

Despite the very few biblical pronouncements, usually in the more obscure parts of the Bible, there is little or no justification today for regarding condemnation of all homosexual acts as a central part of Christian teaching, as many modern theologians have argued. The leadership of the church under Archbishop Welby must now stop dithering around and get on speedily with revising their official teaching on the subject if they wish their expressions of opposition to violence against LGBT people to be seen as anything more than sanctimonious bleating.

I don’t know how I could’ve handled the Orlando massacre if it hadn’t happened on a Sunday, if I hadn’t been able to go to church. My faith is hardly passable most days. I’m committed to Christ but I skip a lot of sundays, and I have a lot of theology that’s tied up in questions I can’t answer, a brain that is steeped in doubt, a rebellious heart that wanders off, and a smart mouth. But when Orlando happened, I felt like I was going to die. I needed prayer. I needed communion. I needed a hymn. I needed a pastor to speak on this and not bury it, or explain it neatly, or whitewash it, or make it all about gun violence and not about the relentless fury of Christian America’s hatred towards LGBTQ people. Thank God, my brother is a pastor.

Pastors and Rabbis and Imams took the stage and my heart leapt. Prophetic passages were read and we were reminded that we all belong together and together we will overcome. In my head, I kept hearing that line of Jesus, “where two or three gather in my name, there I am with them.” And I opened my eyes and there he was.

While deranged people do senseless things, all of us observe, judge and act from some kind of religious background. Singling out people for victimization because of their religion, their sexual orientation, their nationality must be offensive to God’s ears. It has to stop also.

Posted in Link Compilations | Leave a comment

Not equally yokes… You’re a Feminist and Your Partner Suddenly Seems Really Sexist – Now What? — Everyday Feminism

http://everydayfeminism.com/2016/06/partner-seems-sexist-now-what/

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Chuck De Groat Thoughts on how to have a difficult Conversation

The New Exodus

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment