Jeff Hood won’t enable divine narcissism

revjeffhood.com

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

When the Trees Look for a King

Religion that works and if we were God

We’ve been talking about what we mean when we talk about “religion that works“. We look for God to give us what we ask for in our prayers and to shape the world according to our needs and desires. We’ve also talked about the common complaint that “If I were god I would run this world right!”  We’re sure that we would meet out more happiness, justice and beneficence that we currently see and we’d all be a lot happier. This week in Judges we get a peak at reality. How we actually work, what we actually do, and how it usually turns out.

Religion and Politics

2015-10-09 14.53.29

We also saw last week how when you ask people on the street a question like “what would Jesus say about poverty” many respondents immediately jumped to politics. This conversation about us and God has a lot to do with politics and the book of Judges is a very political book. It is a critique about what we do with power and how we are.

“It’s Good to Be King”

history-of-the-world-part-i1

Last week we met Gideon. God found him humiliatingly threshing grain in his winepress for fear the Midianites would steal his food just as they had killed his brothers and were oppressing Israel. God through many signs and wonders raised him up to deliver Israel. In their gratitude mixed I’m sure with some pragmatism and ambition wished to make Gideon king. Gideon right thing in noting that Yhwh was their king so he would refuse but he couldn’t hold himself back from some of the kingly privileges.  Continue reading →

Posted in On the way to Sunday's sermon | Tagged | Leave a comment

The Unreligious see science and religion conflicting

Slate

“The people who are farther away from religion themselves tend to see stronger conflict, because they’re not as close to actual religious people,” says Jones. “They aren’t seeing all those people who don’t have a conflict.” Instead, what they see of the religious community is generally what’s depicted in the media: all-out warfare. The media tends to focus on those rare flashpoints of controversy, such as fights over evolution and the content of science textbooks, and to highlight the most outspoken conservative fundamentalists. For the nonreligious, these strong voices become the faces of religion, and these flashpoints become evidence that religion and science are in conflict.

In fact, religious Americans by and large support science, says Jonathan Hill, a sociologist at Calvin College. As the new Pew survey shows, they want to see more government investment in science, and their religious views hold little bearing on their opinions on the vast majority of scientific issues—including experimental medical treatments, bioengineered organs, genetically modified foods, climate change, and space exploration. That’s not to say conflict doesn’t exist; it does. But most religious people don’t view science in general as the enemy. Instead, they bristle at a few specific issues: Of those who said science conflicted with their own personal beliefs, most cited the specific example of Darwinian evolution, followed by abortion and the Big Bang.

Christianity Today

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Some data on whether youth are leaving the faith

JesusCreed

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

A Chart on Global Income Inequality

Wonkblog

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Religion of the Great Exhaustion

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Jeff Hood Finds Quiet Times Over-rated

his blog

Locates core of Christianity in speaking up.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

NY Mag Piece Searches for New Feminist Sexual Ethic

Mere consent isn’t yielding the results they wanted.

NYMag

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Oprah’s “Seeker” Episode of Belief

https://goo.gl/photos/GVHT7cbBRWokbDSy5

Video link

This is a little clip from the Oprah “Belief” show. What interests me is the filter, the chair the film maker and narrator place the watcher within. This is a story of a young Indian-American woman who is successful in her secular job in the US but feels empty. She goes to India to bath in the Ganges to address her void. What is important to note is that (again as Lewis so poignantly points out in his book the Abolition of Man) that the focus of her concern (via the documentary also made the assumed focus of our concern) is her FEELING of emptiness inside. THAT is the problem. She’s journeys among the holy men asking if they FEEL connected. It is like going into surgery for a life saving procedure and asking “will it hurt?” It isn’t an unreasonable question but the question misses the point of the surgery. This seems the logical result of our secular assumption that she cannot actually connect to anything real. All she needs, and seeks, is the feeling of connection. Connecting to a God or a Dog really matters not, as long as your experience of connection feels satisfactory.

This conception in all its forms, Platonic, Aristotelian, Stoic, Christian, and Oriental alike, I shall henceforth refer to for brevity simply as ‘the Tao’. Some of the accounts of it which I have quoted will seem, perhaps, to many of you merely quaint or even magical. But what is common to them all is something we cannot neglect. It is the doctrine of objective value, the belief that certain attitudes are really true, and others really false, to the kind of thing the universe is and the kind of things we are. Those who know the Tao can hold that to call children delightful or old men venerable is not simply to record a psychological fact about our own parental or filial emotions at the moment, but to recognize a quality which demands a certain response from us whether we make it or not. I myself do not enjoy the society of small children: because I speak from within the Tao I recognize this as a defect in myself— just as a man may have to recognize that he is tone deaf or colour blind. And because our approvals and disapprovals are thus recognitions of objective value or responses to an objective order, therefore emotional states can be in harmony with reason (when we feel liking for what ought to be approved) or out of harmony with reason (when we perceive that liking is due but cannot feel it).

Lewis, C. S. (2009-06-03). The Abolition of Man (Collected Letters of C.S. Lewis) (Kindle Locations 168-177). HarperCollins. Kindle Edition.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Tagged | 1 Comment

Dreher in World Mag on the Benedict Option

World

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Tagged , | Leave a comment