Option 4, Draft B for the TFRSC Due July 15

 

DSC03506I won’t rewrite Draft A but just elaborate and expand a bit.

I am assuming that the mandate of the TFRSC is both to propose next step changes and to suggest a direction for future changes. Usually the way these processes go, especially given the new ED that is just getting started is that you make recommendations, see what is adopted by Synod and the Board and then hand things off to the new administration and/or a subsequent team to follow up with implementation.

I am also realizing that I like the committee haven’t done enough justice to the culture question. I’ve had a couple of posts rolling around in my mind but just like culture is so much more powerful than structures similarly is it so much more difficult to get a handle on. You can point to a structure, write a proposal, make changes in it, but culture is gets at the small decisions people make every day and the way that groups default to practices with very little critique or intention. I hope to write a bit more on culture but that will not likely make the deadline.

The real culture change will probably begin with the new ED anyway. Culture is shaped by decisions, actions and behaviors. Leaders shape culture all the time. Changing culture almost always involves conflict.

5 Streams and “Spinning off” Agencies Continue reading →

Posted in CRC | Leave a comment

Banner Interview with James Bratt on Abraham Kuyper

The Banner

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Option 4, Draft A for the July 15 Deadline for TFRSC

DSC03511

The Task Force Reviewing Structure and Culture asked Synod for input by July 15. The due date is approaching. They gave an email address for Synodical delegates: TFRSC@crcna.org and one for non-synodical delegates: TFRSC2014@crcna.org.

The writing I’ve been doing on the subject has been part of my own processing of the issues in preparation for my input. The due date is approaching and I need to start getting specific.

The team has asked for input and I think if we want to have a conversation if you’ve got thoughts use the email addresses given for giving input. This is the church at work!

1. Look for ministries to spin off and new partners to join with us in them

Continue reading →

Posted in CRC | Tagged | 3 Comments

Why We Need To Figure Out What Pieces to Keep and What Pieces to Give Away

DSC_0224

Fears Expressed About Releasing Centralized Ownership

When I suggest that we should consider spinning off agencies and sending out organizations I people sometimes privately express to me their fears of why we should “keep” these agencies or schools.

  1. Calvin College will become liberal like Harvard
  2. If we release an agency or organization they might go astray and do things we don’t want them to.
  3. We paid for them, why should we give them up?

“The Liberal Fear” Continue reading →

Posted in CRC | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Pre WWI CRC Leader Decry Greed

Calvin in Common Blog from Bratt’s Dutch Calvinism in America

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Getting More Specific About What We Need from Denominations

Faith and Leadership

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

The Hookup Culture Isn’t Working for Women

NYTimes

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Hobby Lobby reaction is due to how two sides view religion

Bloomberg

I think a few things are going on here. The first is that while the religious right views religion as a fundamental, and indeed essential, part of the human experience, the secular left views it as something more like a hobby, so for them it’s as if a major administrative rule was struck down because it unduly burdened model-train enthusiasts. That emotional disconnect makes it hard for the two sides to even debate; the emotional tenor quickly spirals into hysteria as one side says “Sacred!” and the other side says, essentially, “Seriously? Model trains?” That shows in Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s dissent, where it seems to me that she takes a very narrow view of what role religious groups play in the lives of believers and society as a whole.

 

For many people, this massive public territory is all the legitimate province of the state. Institutions within that sphere are subject to close regulation by the government, including regulations that turn those institutions into agents of state goals — for example, by making them buy birth control for anyone they choose to employ. It is not a totalitarian view of government, but it is a totalizing view of government; almost everything we do ends up being shaped by the law and the bureaucrats appointed to enforce it. We resolve the conflict between negative and positive rights by restricting many negative rights to a shrunken private sphere where they cannot get much purchase.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Damon Linker on the Left’s Abandonment of Liberalism and why

The Week

From the dawn of the modern age, religious thinkers have warned that, strictly speaking, secular politics is impossible — that without the transcendent foundation of Judeo-Christian monotheism to limit the political sphere, ostensibly secular citizens would begin to invest political ideas and ideologies with transcendent, theological meaning.

Put somewhat differently: Human beings will be religious one way or another. Either they will be religious about religious things, or they will be religious about political things.

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment

Stella Young TED talk “I’m not your inspiration”

TED talk on Inspiration Porn

Posted in Daily Links and Notes | Leave a comment