I won’t rewrite Draft A but just elaborate and expand a bit.
I am assuming that the mandate of the TFRSC is both to propose next step changes and to suggest a direction for future changes. Usually the way these processes go, especially given the new ED that is just getting started is that you make recommendations, see what is adopted by Synod and the Board and then hand things off to the new administration and/or a subsequent team to follow up with implementation.
I am also realizing that I like the committee haven’t done enough justice to the culture question. I’ve had a couple of posts rolling around in my mind but just like culture is so much more powerful than structures similarly is it so much more difficult to get a handle on. You can point to a structure, write a proposal, make changes in it, but culture is gets at the small decisions people make every day and the way that groups default to practices with very little critique or intention. I hope to write a bit more on culture but that will not likely make the deadline.
The real culture change will probably begin with the new ED anyway. Culture is shaped by decisions, actions and behaviors. Leaders shape culture all the time. Changing culture almost always involves conflict.
5 Streams and “Spinning off” Agencies Continue reading

